Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:


Pages 14-37

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 14...
... 15 STATUS OF CHANGEABLE MESSAGE SIGNS Background Once a CMS system is installed, a question always arises concerning when messages should be displayed during non-incident/non-roadwork periods. There are the following two schools of thought on this topic: 1.
From page 15...
... CMSs sitting idle for several months prompted New York DOT to adopt a policy of displaying some type of message on the freeway CMSs at all times. Survey Results General A summary of the status of the CMSs during non-incident/ non-roadwork periods reported by the agencies that responded to the questionnaire is shown in Figure 2.
From page 16...
... 17 • Test the CMSs, so the public knows they are working. Do not test the signs with a time and temperature display feature (1 TMC)
From page 17...
... Messages Displayed Public Response to Messages Displayed during Non-Incident/ Non-Roadwork Periods Twenty-three of the 45 TMCs (51%) that regularly or periodically display messages during non-incident/non-roadwork periods as an alternative to leaving the signs blank reported a very favorable (22%)
From page 18...
... 19 messages during the peak, off-peak, or both, when incidents or roadwork are not present are summarized in Figure 7. Ninety-three percent stated that they do not have plans to change their policy, whereas 7% plan to change.
From page 19...
... • Display of historic travel times; and • Daily repetition of the same travel times displayed to commuters. First, as previously noted, current technology does not allow TMCs to accurately predict travel times; therefore, recent historical travel times are displayed.
From page 20...
... 21 Agency/Traffic Management Center Location Peak Off-Peak California Department of Transportation • Irvine • Los Angeles • Oakland • Sacramento • San Bernardino • San Diego X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Colorado DOT • Golden (statewide) X Delaware Department of Transportation (statewide)
From page 21...
... Reasons for Not Displaying Travel Time The primary reasons cited as to why travel-time information was not displayed were that (1) infrastructure and/or software was not available and (2)
From page 22...
... 23 • Drivers were slowing down to read the signs (2 TMCs)
From page 23...
... • It is not necessary to display travel times on all CMSs. Some CMS locations do not lend themselves to traveltime messages (1 TMC)
From page 24...
... 25 that travel time was not displayed owing to the lack of funding to implement the necessary hardware and software. CONGESTION MESSAGES Background Sometimes CMSs are used to present information about traffic conditions when the freeway becomes congested.
From page 25...
... During the off-peak, 69% of the TMCs reported that congestion messages are not displayed during non-incident/ non-roadwork periods. Thirty-one percent stated that congestion messages are regularly or periodically displayed.
From page 26...
... 27 Examples of Typical Congestion Messages Exhibit 4 shows examples of typical messages that were reported by the 35 of 100 TMCs that regularly or periodically display congestion messages rather than leaving CMSs blank. Experiences and Lessons Learned The experiences and lessons learned most noted by the TMCs that display congestion messages was that the messages must be accurate and up to date.
From page 27...
... ogy and issues created by congestion in this area. Providing congestion information to motorists allows the local commuter to consider an alternate route or arterial and provides additional information to unfamiliar motorists so that they may drive more safely on roadways with which they are not familiar (1 TMC)
From page 28...
... 29 resulted in a lower percentage of subjects who indicated they would divert than did the message HEAVY CONGESTION. Several studies have been conducted to evaluate advisory speed messages on CMSs in highway work zones.
From page 29...
... Concerns and Challenges Only three comments were received regarding concerns and challenges. Specific comments follow: • A concern and challenge is maintaining credibility.
From page 30...
... 31 Public Response The reported public response is summarized in Figure 26. Only 17% of the TMCs that display PSAs as an alternative to leaving the CMSs blank reported that they received a favorable response from the public.
From page 31...
... 32 • A message should be run for a short period of time and/or should not be displayed too often (8 TMCs)
From page 32...
... 33 non-traffic-related messages if PSAs are posted. Some TMCs voiced differences of opinion with agency administration/ management about displaying PSAs.
From page 33...
... administrative/upper-management preference, TMC manager/ supervisor preference, both administrative and TMC preference, or as part of governor safety program, statewide safety program, or law enforcement agency request. Only 1% of the TMCs included research results in their decision.
From page 34...
... 35 • Post only during off-peak or in off-peak direction to minimize unintended congestion (2 TMCs)
From page 35...
... • Trying to avoid private-interest type requests (1 TMC)
From page 36...
... 37 display traffic law or ordinance messages rather than leaving CMSs blank. Experiences and Lessons Learned Only a few TMCs reported on their experiences and lessons learned with displaying traffic law or ordinance messages.
From page 37...
... • Received positive feedback from law enforcement when conducting routine traffic stops in areas where messages are displayed. For example, we have a message explaining the Texas law requiring traffic to move over when an emergency vehicle is stopped on the roadway.

Key Terms



This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.