Cooperative Agreements for Corridor Management (2004) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:
Pages 36-39
The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.
From page 36... ...
33 APPENDIX A Survey Responses SURVEY OF STATE AND PROVINCIAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCIES Agreements Between Government Entities to Manage Arterial Corridors to Preserve Mobility and Safety Number of responses: 22, response rate: 35% 1. Has your agency entered into a cooperative agreement with other governmental agencies or private entities for the purpose of managing arterial corridors to preserve mobility and safety?
|
From page 37... ...
34 "Resolutions: Local governments are asked to endorse the Corridor Management Plan and can cite their concerns and issues that remain to be resolved." "Maintenance agreement, development agreements, public–private agreements, and memoranda of understanding: Used to develop, design, construct, operate, manage and maintain a 4-lane, level 1 access controlled highway." "Resolutions, maintenance agreements, development agreements, intergovernmental agreements, memoranda of understanding, along with the mutual adoption of facility plans, are intended to make the corridors work. These agreements can take the form of plans (e.g., access management plans, facility management plans)
|
From page 38... ...
35 Outdated or ineffective state corridor management policies/practices (1) Outdated or ineffective local corridor management policies/practices (2)
|
From page 39... ...
36 "Although we have not entered into corridor management agreements we have been involved in implementing corridor management actions/projects .
|
Key Terms
This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More
information on Chapter Skim is available.