Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

Oyster Reef Restoration Monitoring
Pages 123-136

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 123...
... (4) increasing filtration, nutrient cycling, and Although intertidal oyster reefs are not nitrogen, phosphorus, and/or carbon generally harvested in the Gulf of Mexico, they sequestration in tissues and shells to meet the were likely directly affected by oil and act as seed goal of improving water quality or clarity (Dame areas to populate harvested reefs, as well as and Libes, 1993; Nelson et al., 2004; Grizzle et provide a number of other valuable services.
From page 124...
... However, uncertainties still hinder to assess changes in oyster populations on effective restoration efforts in the Gulf of Mexico. constructed reefs due to a lack of replication, For example, in some cases, simply restoring consistent and quantitative methodologies, and natural and historical hydrology to past flow related sampling designs (Kennedy et al., 2011; regimes through removal of man-made Baggett et al., 2014; La Peyre et al., 2014)
From page 125...
... . critical nature of de n eveloping obbjectives and d Withhout the stated objective the abili es, ity to related me etrics a priori and for the objectives to i, o effecctively compa are monitoring results and to be explicitly followed for the variou purposes of f us f asses ss progress toward o oyster restooration restoration monitoring.
From page 126...
... For example, many subtidal Gulf of Mexico oyster reefs, it has been researchers and managers are using objectives suggested that projects should at a minimum tied to specific ecosystem services derived from sample a limited suite of universal metrics that are oyster restoration efforts to guide the choice of used to assess reef, oyster, and environmental monitoring metrics (Coen and Luckenbach, 2000; conditions as well as a project's performance Peterson et al., 2003; NRC, 2004; Coen et al., regardless of its objective(s) (see below and Table 2004; Grabowski et al., 2007, 2012; Pollack et II.1)
From page 127...
... . one wants to "jump start" reef restoration efforts In the past, sampling often only occurred (e.g., in the Chesapeake Bay or Hudson River during daylight hours, on weekdays, in suitable estuary)
From page 128...
... Table II.1 Metrics Conside M ered Good Pracctice to Monitor Oyster Reef R Restoration Activities for Construction, Performance t m Toward Pro oject Objectives, and Program-Level or Large e-Scale Assessmments.
From page 129...
... Oyster Ree Restoration Monitoring ef 129
From page 130...
... sites can be used to assess trajectories mentioned in Table II.1, low levels of dissolved of constructed oyster reefs through time (NRC, oxygen is typically less of a concern for intertidal 1992; Coen et al., 1999a; Coen and Luckenbach, oysters than for subtidal oysters, but time of 2000; Baggett et al., 2014, 2015)
From page 131...
... Habitat Suitability Index performance of oyster habitat restoration. Models: Gulf of Mexico Eastern Oyster.
From page 132...
... Restoring oyster reefs to recover ecosystem 2004. A SC Sea Grant Report of a 2004 services.
From page 133...
... on oyster reefs: how habitat structure Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and influences individual performance. Ecological Ecology 298:347-368.
From page 134...
... 1995. Early Chesapeake Bay oyster recovery: Native recruitment and growth of the American oyster restoration master plan, Maryland and oyster Crassostrea virginica (Bivalvia: Virginia.
From page 135...
... 2016. Quantifying fish and sustaining oyster reefs Journal of Sea Research mobile invertebrate production from a 108:1-9.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.