Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:


Pages 82-86

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 82...
... H-1 A P P E N D I X H Summary Project Description Mountain View is a 38-mile north-south corridor west of Salt Lake City. The project includes a limited-access highway component and related roadway facilities, a transit component [bus rapid transit (BRT)
From page 83...
... H-2 Unique agencyspecific program requirements under the NEPA umbrella Differing agency interpretations of NEPA requirements Anticipating which agencies will have a major federal action Efficient coordination among agencies Securing funding for multimodal NEPA studies Table H-1. Challenges summary.
From page 84...
... H-3 Lead, Cooperating, and Participating Agencies UDOT was the project sponsor, UTA was a co-sponsor, and FHWA was the lead federal agency for NEPA. Initially, FTA agreed to serve as a joint lead agency.
From page 85...
... H-4 Impact of These Requirements Differences between the FHWA and FTA approaches to planning and NEPA were an issue. At the time of the Mountain View NEPA process, federal laws governing the transit program required a corridor-level analysis of alternative modes and alignments for fixed guideway transit projects funded with New Starts grants.
From page 86...
... H-5 Be cautious about including local interagency agreements in NEPA documents. UDOT and UTA tied the highway and transit project implementation schedules together in an interlocal agreement that was made part of the ROD.

Key Terms



This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.