Skip to main content

2015-2016 Assessment of the Army Research Laboratory (2017) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:

Appendix C: Assessment Criteria
Pages 213-214

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 213...
... • Are programs crafted to employ the appropriate mix of theory, computation, and experimentation? To assist ARL in addressing promising technical approaches, the Board will also consider the following questions: • Are there especially promising projects that, with improved direction or resources, could produce outstanding results that can be transitioned ultimately to the field?
Read the entire page →
From page 214...
... • Does the project plan identify dependencies (i.e., successes depend on success of other activities within the project or on the success of projects developed outside ARL)
Read the entire page →

Key Terms

  • professional activities
  • graduate committees
  • research challenge
  • technical approaches
  • performing required

  • improved direction
  • hypotheses appropriately
  • promising projects
  • invited talks
  • demands technological

  • appropriate process
  • laboratory experiment
  • work reviewed
  • arltab applied
  • projects developed

  • following metrics
  • conference committees
  • identify dependencies
  • appear reasonable
  • technical innovation

  • appropriately framed
  • equipment state
  • field test
  • outside arl
  • addressing promising

  • project plan
  • assist arl
  • underlying science
  • programs crafted
  • promising technical


    • This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
    More information on Chapter Skim is available.