A Review of the Environmental Protection Agency's Science to Achieve Results Research Program (2017) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:
3 Public Benefits of the Science to Achieve Results Program
3 Public Benefits of the Science to Achieve Results Program
Pages 34-51
The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.
From page 34... ...
These include process inputs, such as the allocated budget, the personnel assigned to admin ister it, and the procedures for selection and awarding of grants and fellowships. They also include such planning inputs as the strategic research action plans (StRAPs)
|
From page 35... ...
program by STAR grantees, and one that the committee conducted by searching Google Scholar for "Science to Achieve Results EPA OR ORD" in December 2016. The committee chose Google Scholar because it is known to include more early publications and preprints than other databases, such as the Web of Science and Scopus (Meho and Kiduk 2007)
|
From page 36... ...
awareness of facilities for Plans data collection environmental - Develop issues and -Knowledge and analysis from research, infrastructure impacts to scientific Strengthened human health reviews, - Mentor Development environmental -Guidance workshops, Next research of investigator research -Regulations literature generation of assistants/ and student community -Standards scientists students/fellows careers -Technologies FIGURE 3-1 Logic model for the EPA STAR program. Lines represent linkages between the logic-model components.
|
From page 37... ...
, a voluntary Web-based application system through which STAR fellows could choose to report career information, the committee assessed whether these scientists were continuing careers in environmental research. The FII was developed in 2003 for program-administration purposes, to collect student applications and supporting materials, and to provide a mechanism for fellows to submit information during and after their fellowships, including information on their research projects, publications, awards, and careers.
|
From page 38... ...
grants. Using Thoms son Reuters Essential Sc s cience Indicato and Journa Citation Re ors al eports as benc chmarks, the contractor identified 252 of the 6,614 NCER article as being in t r 2 es the top 1% of academic journal citation thus, the pa % j ns; apers had high impact and we ere among the most high cited papers in their scient hly s tific fields.
|
From page 39... ...
The committee found examples of STAR research that had had various types of benefits: reducing the costs of compliance with environmental regulations, providing a scientific basis for decisions required to protect public health and the environment, and improved methods for environmental management. Some STAR research grants may lead to reductions in the cost of complying with environmental regulations.
|
From page 40... ...
2006. Reduction 25 23 2 8 10 10 in fine particulate air pollution and mortality: Extended follow-up of the Harvard Six Cities study.
|
From page 41... ...
2001. 3 13 8 1 2 16 Increased particulate air pollution and the triggering of myocardial infarction.
|
From page 42... ...
Documents Awarded Grant Abstract Title Arsenicals, Glutathione Reductase and Cellular 826136 2 1997 Redox Status Studies of the Infectivity of Norwalk and 826139 2 1998 Norwalk-like Viruses Ambient Particle Health Effects: Exposure, 827353 4 1999 Susceptibility, and Mechanisms 827351 3 1999 NYU-EPA PM Center: Health Risks of PM Components 827352 11 1999 Southern California Particle Center and Supersite (SCPCS) Ultrafine Particles: Characterization, Health Effects 827354 8 1999 and Pathophysiological Mechanisms Center for the Study of Prevalent Neurotoxicants 829389 2 2001 in Children 829436 2 2001 Study of Phthalates in Pregnant Woman and Children Inflow, Chemistry and Deposition of Mercury to the 829797 2 2002 West Coast of the United States Application of a Unified Aerosol-Chemistry-Climate GCM to Understand the Effects of Changing Climate and 830959 2 2003 Global Anthropogenic Emissions on U.S.
|
From page 43... ...
The STAR program implemented several large initiatives focused on the human health effects of air pollution, such as the Particulate Matter Centers, the Clean Air Research Centers, and the Air, Climate, and Energy Centers. Studies supported by those centers showed that increased air-pollution exposure leads to a decrease in life expectancy; examples include a followup of the Harvard Six Cities Study (Laden et al.
|
From page 44... ...
TABLE 3-3 Selected Examples of STAR Research Findings and the Public Benefits to Which They Contributed Environmental Program Research Findings Public Benefits ACE PM2.5 exposures lead to cardiovascular Lowering PM2.5 national ambient air effects and are linked with hospital quality standard from 15 to 12 µg/m3 admissions and premature death (EPA 2012)
|
From page 45... ...
. The STAR fellowship program added to the knowledge community.
|
From page 46... ...
There is a substantial effort throughout the federal government to mine data in reports, literature, administrative records, and so forth to identify intermediate outcomes more effectively, to link federally funded projects to long-term impacts, and to track career outcomes of graduate students supported by fellowships or graduate research assistantships. NIH, for example, has created the High Impacts Tracking System.
|
From page 47... ...
U.S. EPA particulate matter research centers: Summary of research results for 2005-2011.
|
From page 48... ...
2015c. Safe and Sustainable Water Resources Strategic Research Action Plan 2016 2019.
|
From page 49... ...
2006. Reduction in fine particulate air pollution and mortality: Extended follow-up of the Harvard Six Cities study.
|
From page 50... ...
2009. Scientific and public health impacts of the NIEHS Extramural Asthma Research Program insights from primary data.
|
From page 51... ...
2016. Presentation at the First Meeting on Review of EPA's Science to Achieve Results' Research Grants Program, June 21, 2016, Washington, DC.
|
Key Terms
This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More
information on Chapter Skim is available.