Sexual Harassment of Women Climate, Culture, and Consequences in Academic Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2018) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:
Appendix D: Consultant Report on the University of Texas System Campus Climate Survey
Appendix D: Consultant Report on the University of Texas System Campus Climate Survey
Pages 275-292
The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.
From page 275... ...
Kevin M Swartout, Georgia State University Chair, Administrator-Researcher Campus Climate Collaborative 275
|
From page 276... ...
More information on the UT System campus climate survey and results can be found at https://www.utsystem.edu/ sites/clase. The Penn State climate survey data includes data from the University Park Campus and the College of Medicine at the Hershey campus.
|
From page 277... ...
Table D-1 depicts the overall faculty/staff sexual harassment rates by student gender identity. Of note, incidence of sexual harassment by faculty or staff significantly differed as a function of gender, with high incidence rates among women and those who endorsed a gender other than male or female relative to the overall sample.
|
From page 278... ...
Results of a binary logistic regression suggest that female medical stu dents were 220 percent more likely than non-STEM majors to experience sexual harassment by faculty or staff (OR = 3.20, p < .001) , and female engineering students were 34 percent more likely than non-STEM majors to experience sexual harassment by faculty or staff (OR = 1.34, p = .002)
|
From page 279... ...
Figure D-2 depicts similar rates reported by women in the Penn State sample, and Figures 3 and 4 depict sexual harassment rates reported by men in the respective samples. 100 Overall 90 Gender Harassment – Sexist Hostility Gender Harassment – Crude Behavior 80 Unwanted Sexual Attention Sexual Coercion 70 Percentage "Yes" 60 50.4%49.6% 50 42.6% 40.8% 40 32.9% 30.6% 30 23.2% 20 18.1% 12.8% 10 3.9% 5.0% 5.3% 1.2% 1.0% 0.4% 0 Undergraduate Graduate College of Medicine FIGURE D-2 Faculty/staff sexual harassment incidence for female students by type/level of student (Penn State Data)
|
From page 280... ...
. 100 Overall 90 Gender Harassment – Sexist Hostility Gender Harassment – Crude Behavior Unwanted Sexual Attention 80 Sexual Coercion 70 60 Percentage "Yes" 50 40 32.6% 29.3% 30 25.6% 23.3% 22.3% 21.2% 20 17.1% 10 8.4% 7.5% 2.5% 2.0% 2.3% 2.8% 1.5% 0.6% 0 Undergraduate Graduate College of Medicine FIGURE D-4 Faculty/staff sexual harassment incidence for male students by type/level of student (Penn State Data)
|
From page 281... ...
× 2(SH status) analysis of variances supported significant differences in physical health, mental health, and feelings of safety on campus as functions of both academic major status (non-STEM, Science/Technology, Engineering, and Medicine)
|
From page 282... ...
282 APPENDIX D FIGURES D-5 through D-7 Health and safety outcomes by student major and faculty/ staff sexual harassment status.
|
From page 283... ...
. FIGURE D-9 Academic engagement for female medical students as a function of faculty/ staff sexual harassment experience.
|
From page 284... ...
× 2(SH status) analysis of variances support significant differences in reports of missing class, being late for class, making excuses to get out of class, and doing poor work as functions of both academic major status (non-STEM, Science/Technology, Engineering, and Medicine)
|
From page 285... ...
perceived their campus as less safe than the other female STEM students. There were no other significant interactions between race and sexual harassment experiences on health and safety outcomes.
|
From page 286... ...
286 TABLE D-3 Cell Sizes for Each Racial/Ethnic Categorization by Academic Major (only female students) African Pacific White American AIAN Asian Biracial Hispanic Multiracial Islander Total Non-STEM 3163 562 88 983 199 3512 80 36 8623 Science 2463 538 75 1231 148 3035 57 36 7583 Engineering 310 41 7 325 16 223 4 11 937 Medicine 137 21 5 69 8 58 3 3 304 Total 6073 1162 175 2608 371 6828 144 86 17447
|
From page 287... ...
. FIGURE D-13 Sexual harassment rates among female STEM majors by dichotomous race/ethnicity.
|
From page 288... ...
. • Female students who experienced sexual harassment, compared with those who had not, generally reported worse physical and mental health outcomes, feeling less safe on campus, and higher levels across various indicators of academic disengagement.
|
From page 289... ...
The institutional registrar did not provide the UT research team with any additional identifying information, nor was identifying information collected with the sensitive survey data. Although e-mail addresses were collective to facilitate incentives, they were not linked to the sensitive survey data.
|
From page 290... ...
Additionally, the research team encouraged stakeholder groups at each institution to engage in survey recruitment. Each group was provided with templates for recruitment and promotional e-mails, fliers, and social media posts to help increase awareness of the study.
|
From page 291... ...
Measures Faculty/Staff-Perpetrated Sexual Harassment. The Sexual Harassment by Faculty/Staff module of the ARC3 Campus Climate Survey was adapted from the Department of Defense Sexual Experiences Questionnaire (SEQ-DOD)
|
From page 292... ...
All health institution students were given a version of the survey that included both sexual harassment modules. Data Cleaning The UT research team assessed the climate survey data for quality and consistency using a multiple-step approach.
|
Key Terms
This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More
information on Chapter Skim is available.