Neuroforensics Exploring the Legal Implications of Emerging Neurotechnologies: Proceedings of a Workshop (2018) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:
Appendix B Workshop Agenda
Appendix B Workshop Agenda
Pages 51-56
The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.
From page 51... ...
Several ongoing research efforts, such as the Brain Research through Advancing Innovative Neurotechnologies (BRAIN) Initiative and the European Human Brain Project, are strong catalysts for the development of the next generation of methods for observing 51
|
From page 52... ...
Emerging neurotechnologies promise increased access to evidence obtained from the central nervous system and thus to brain function associated with complex behaviors and cognitive characteristics. Indeed, neuroscience evidence obtained from emerging neurotechnologies conceivably might be used by law enforcement, the courts, regulatory agencies, and others as factors in predicting dangerousness, assessing competence to stand trial, assessing volitional control over actions, revealing mitigating factors relevant to sentencing, predicting recidivism, distinguishing pain from malingering, verifying intent, and manipulating memories.
|
From page 53... ...
HYMAN, Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University (CO-CHAIR) Legal Developments HENRY T
|
From page 54... ...
Presentations Electrophysiology Measures in Perception and Recognition ADRIAN NESTOR, University of Toronto Contribution of Genetics to Behavioral Prediction BENJAMIN NEALE, Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University 11:30 a.m. Discussion 11:45 a.m.
|
From page 55... ...
1:00 p.m. Presentations Closed-Loop Brain Stimulation AYSEGUL GUNDUZ, University of Florida Understanding the Neural Basis of Volitional State Through Continuous Recordings in Humans SYDNEY CASH, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard University 1:40 p.m.
|
From page 56... ...
2:25 p.m. Presentations and Reflections DAVID FAIGMAN, University of California, San Francisco FRANCIS SHEN, University of Minnesota JUDGE BARBARA HERVEY, Texas Court of Criminal Appeals JUDGE NANCY GERTNER (Ret.)
|
Key Terms
This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More
information on Chapter Skim is available.