Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:


Pages 50-59

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 50...
... 50 [In Florida] MCOs are responsible for NEMT as a service of the managed care plan.
From page 51...
... Models for Providing Non-Emergency Medical Transportation 51 Each MCO Contracts with Private For-Profit Brokers Each MCO contracts with one of three for-profit brokers to provide NEMT under the managed care plan. The brokers contract with a variety of transportation providers including taxi companies, public transit agencies, human services transportation providers, and for-profit transportation companies.
From page 52...
... 52 Handbook for Examining the Effects of Non-Emergency Medical Transportation Brokerages on Transportation Coordination transportation coordinated transportation. Human services transportation contracts with six regional transit authorities to act as brokers for transportation services for EOHHS clients.
From page 53...
... Models for Providing Non-Emergency Medical Transportation 53 County-Based Management for NEMT Using Community Transportation Each county DSS contracts with the local community transportation provider to provide NEMT on a fee-for-service basis. DSS is responsible for determining if a Medicaid beneficiary is eligible for NEMT, authorizing trip eligibility, and record keeping for post-trip verification.
From page 54...
... 54 Handbook for Examining the Effects of Non-Emergency Medical Transportation Brokerages on Transportation Coordination Pennsylvania: In-House Management and Regional Broker County Coordinators for Transportation Services In Pennsylvania, NEMT is called the Medical Assistance Transportation Program (MATP)
From page 55...
... Models for Providing Non-Emergency Medical Transportation 55 for failure to maintain adequate financial records and client encounter data, and HHSC assumed responsibility for in-house management in that one region. Benefits of the Change to Regional Brokers From the perspective of the state Medicaid agency, the change to regional brokers lowered the capitated payment for NEMT after 2014 and reduced the potential for fraud, waste, and abuse.
From page 56...
... 56 Handbook for Examining the Effects of Non-Emergency Medical Transportation Brokerages on Transportation Coordination In-House Management Case study states for in-house management are North Carolina and Pennsylvania. In both states, the NEMT model is in-house management for county-based, coordinated transportation, shown in Table 8.
From page 57...
... Models for Providing Non-Emergency Medical Transportation 57 Regional Brokers Case study states for regional brokers are Massachusetts and Texas. In Massachusetts, the regional brokers are regional transit authorities.
From page 58...
... 58 Handbook for Examining the Effects of Non-Emergency Medical Transportation Brokerages on Transportation Coordination Effects Massachusetts Texas Access to Medicaid services • The use of regional transit authorities to broker coordinated human services transportation has produced positive results for the state Medicaid agency by containing costs per passenger trip and ensuring service quality. • Massachusetts reports a lower cost per passenger trip for NEMT compared to other case study states.
From page 59...
... Models for Providing Non-Emergency Medical Transportation 59 Summary This chapter examines how the different NEMT models affect access to Medicaid services and coordination with human services transportation and public transportation. The different NEMT models are in-house management, statewide broker, regional brokers, and MCOs.

Key Terms



This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.