Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

1 Introduction
Pages 17-26

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 17...
... Despite these documented health benefits and previous efforts to promote physical activity in the U.S. population, most Americans do not meet current public health guidelines for physical activity (CDC, 2014)
From page 18...
... • Reduced risk of dementia (including Alzheimer's disease) • Improved quality of life • Reduced anxiety • Reduced risk of depression • Improved sleep • Slowed or reduced weight gain • Weight loss, particularly when combined with reduced calorie intake • Prevention of weight regain following initial weight loss • Improved bone health • Improved physical function • Lower risk of falls (older adults)
From page 19...
... Subsequently, groups involved in the 2014 meeting, including CDC, ACSM, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) , the American Heart Asso BOX 1-2 Strategic Priorities to Guide Future Physical Activity Surveillance in the United States, as Identified in Fulton et al.
From page 20...
... . As a result, in April 2017, the Physical Activity and Health Innovation Collaborative, an ad hoc activity affiliated with the Roundtable on Obesity Solutions of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, served as the convener for a meeting of more than 40 experts who were brought together to identify specific actions that could improve physical activity surveillance in the United States and to suggest approaches for implementing those actions.
From page 21...
... to identify specific strategies for implementing those recommended actions; • provide guidance and oversight to a consultant who will develop tools to facilitate surveillance within the topical area of community supports for active transportation, that will include developing: ­two brief sets of prioritized questionnaires to assess: (1) an individ o  ual's perceptions of community support for physical activity; and (2)
From page 22...
... •  there a likely receptivity to the recommended strategy for those who Is will act on it? Impact •  there potential for impacting practice (e.g., public health transportation, Is etc.)
From page 23...
... • The major focus of this study was the creation of a more robust system for surveillance of physical activity to support public health practice by enhancing what is currently measured. Accordingly, the committee strove to consider the needs and interests of a broad array of stakeholders, collaborators, and professionals whose inter ests, skills, and needs would ultimately determine the extent to which the committee's recommendations would be acted upon.
From page 24...
... Multiple stakeholders will be asked to share data, make new investments, and reallocate existing resources. • Although the focus of this study is on creating a more robust physi cal activity surveillance system to support public health practice,
From page 25...
... A total of 59 implementation actions were identified: 16 for children, 16 for health care, 12 for workplaces, and 15 for community supports for physical activity. The committee's task also included providing guidance and oversight to a consultant hired to develop tools to facilitate surveillance, specifically within the topical area of community supports for active transportation, including prioritized questionnaires and "how-to" protocols.
From page 26...
... 1988. Public health surveillance in the United States.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.