Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:


Pages 50-105

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 50...
... 50 A P P E N D I X A Literature Review Summary 1. Global Reporting Initiative (GRI)
From page 51...
... Literature Review Summary 51 • Materiality: Organizations should select topics material to their organization. Materiality is defined as topics that (1)
From page 52...
... 52 Social and Economic Sustainability Performance Measures for Public Transportation: Final Guidance Document Source: GRI 101: Foundation (2016)
From page 53...
... Literature Review Summary 53 2. Well Measured: Developing Indicators for Sustainable and Livable Transport Planning Author(s)
From page 54...
... 54 Social and Economic Sustainability Performance Measures for Public Transportation: Final Guidance Document • Outcomes (ultimate results, such as the number of miles traveled and mode share, average travel speeds, congestion and crowding, number of accidents and casualties, energy consumption, pollution emissions, and user satisfaction)
From page 55...
... Literature Review Summary 55 • Net Effects (indicators differentiate between net [total] impacts and shifts of impacts to different locations and times)
From page 56...
... 56 Social and Economic Sustainability Performance Measures for Public Transportation: Final Guidance Document 3. Analyzing the Sustainability Performance of Public Transit Author(s)
From page 57...
... Literature Review Summary 57 4. TCRP Report 186: Economic Impact Case Study Tool for Transit Author(s)
From page 58...
... 58 Social and Economic Sustainability Performance Measures for Public Transportation: Final Guidance Document The case studies first measure gross (pre/post) changes, then estimate net impacts after accounting for underlying pre/post trends economic trends, relative role of the transportation project in a larger package of improvements, and program interventions.
From page 59...
... Literature Review Summary 59 5. Selecting Performance Measures for Transportation Planning: Developing a Facilitator's Toolbox Author(s)
From page 60...
... 60 Social and Economic Sustainability Performance Measures for Public Transportation: Final Guidance Document 4. The type of performance measure should be considered in determining which measures are most appropriate for a planning organization or level of geography.
From page 61...
... Literature Review Summary 61 6. Final Report: Livability Performance Measures to Transportation Plans and Projects Author(s)
From page 62...
... 62 Social and Economic Sustainability Performance Measures for Public Transportation: Final Guidance Document • T (Time Sensitive) o Does this better address long- or short-range goals?
From page 63...
... Literature Review Summary 63 with a larger set of measures than if they are engaging with a more comprehensive database (such as the complete Community Vision Metrics Tool)
From page 64...
... 64 Social and Economic Sustainability Performance Measures for Public Transportation: Final Guidance Document 7. Transportation Performance Management for Livability and Social Sustainability: Developing and Applying a Conceptual Framework Author(s)
From page 65...
... Literature Review Summary 65 outcomes. Essential is "the concept of an organizational influence pathway, which decision-makers must identify and use to clearly link agency actions to the desired outcomes that are addressed by strategic goals" (Fischer 2014, p.
From page 66...
... 66 Social and Economic Sustainability Performance Measures for Public Transportation: Final Guidance Document 8. NCHRP Report 750: Strategic Issues Facing Transportation, Volume 4: Sustainability as an Organizing Principle for Transportation Agencies Author(s)
From page 67...
... Literature Review Summary 67 • Future sustainability/a sustainable transportation system (current transition) , and • Society-sustainable policy (i.e., triple-bottom-line sustainability)
From page 68...
... 68 Social and Economic Sustainability Performance Measures for Public Transportation: Final Guidance Document Scenario Model (PRISM) model, a proprietary transportation economic impact model, and HDR's sustainability return on investment (SROI)
From page 69...
... Literature Review Summary 69 9. Community Vision Metrics Tool Author(s)
From page 70...
... 70 Social and Economic Sustainability Performance Measures for Public Transportation: Final Guidance Document 10. TCRP Report 165: Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, 3d Ed.
From page 71...
... Literature Review Summary 71 Key Points The manual categorizes transit performance measures into the operator point of view, passenger point of view and vehicle point of view. Service measures are distinguished as a subset of performance measures that represents the passenger's point of view.
From page 72...
... 72 Social and Economic Sustainability Performance Measures for Public Transportation: Final Guidance Document 11. Blueprint for Sustainability: One Department of Transportation's Pursuit of Performance-Based Accountability Author(s)
From page 73...
... Literature Review Summary 73 Determining what sustainability means for the North Carolina DOT was critical to gaining buy-in. The working group initially defined the following four areas of emphasis (p.
From page 74...
... 74 Social and Economic Sustainability Performance Measures for Public Transportation: Final Guidance Document performance measures are publicly available on the agency's website via an interactive organizational performance dashboard: https://www.ncdot.gov/about-us/our-mission/Perform ance/Pages/default.aspx. The authors of the paper identified the following lessons learned (pp.
From page 75...
... Literature Review Summary 75 Abstract This accessible and lay reader-friendly report reviews the state of economic analysis practice at several state DOTs around the country. Its relatively non-technical approach may make it a suitable study for DOT managers and decision-makers who desire an overview of transportation and economic development, including gaps in practice.
From page 76...
... 76 Social and Economic Sustainability Performance Measures for Public Transportation: Final Guidance Document Many states factor economic outcomes into transportation planning and decision-making. The study summarizes survey results that indicated that nine states reported varying use of performance measures in agency performance tracking and long-range planning.
From page 77...
... Literature Review Summary 77 Of interest is a table highlighting the usefulness of data sources and tools (including Census Transportation Planning Products, NEPA analysis, TREDIS) in addressing social and economic outcomes.
From page 78...
... 78 Social and Economic Sustainability Performance Measures for Public Transportation: Final Guidance Document 13. TCRP Web-Only Document 56: Methodology for Determining the Economic Development Impacts of Transit Projects Author(s)
From page 79...
... Literature Review Summary 79 Key Points This research might best be used by a relatively large transit agency with a fairly mature transit system including a rail component. The United Kingdom and Australia would be good resources for transit agencies looking to inform an analysis of transit's economic impact, as this research suggests a mature body of practice in both countries.
From page 80...
... 80 Social and Economic Sustainability Performance Measures for Public Transportation: Final Guidance Document 14. NCHRP Report 708: A Guidebook for Sustainability Performance Measures for Transportation Agencies Author(s)
From page 81...
... Literature Review Summary 81 The report also cautions agencies to consider the type of performance measure during the selection process. Some measures may closely reflect actions taken by the agency (e.g., process measures)
From page 82...
... 82 Social and Economic Sustainability Performance Measures for Public Transportation: Final Guidance Document 15. Evaluating Transportation Economic Development Impacts -- Understanding How Transport Policy and Planning Decisions Affect Employment, Incomes, Productivity, Competitiveness, Property Values, and Tax Revenues Author(s)
From page 83...
... Literature Review Summary 83 • Investment, • Profitability, • Property values, • Business activity (sales) , • Tax revenues, • Affordability, • Equity, and • Desired (social)
From page 84...
... 84 Social and Economic Sustainability Performance Measures for Public Transportation: Final Guidance Document is the notion that a net reduction in VMT may not be the most economically beneficial objective, and instead a reduction in VMT by class of trip (e.g., under five miles per trip, over 4,000 miles per year) might be a more appropriate objective.
From page 85...
... Literature Review Summary 85 16. Dallas Area Rapid Transit: Telling Our Sustainability Story (Presentation)
From page 86...
... 86 Social and Economic Sustainability Performance Measures for Public Transportation: Final Guidance Document Key Points DART provides a great example of using a methodical, collaborative process to identify goals, objectives and performance measures. Because DART has just implemented this new sustainability approach, it is not yet possible to evaluate how successful the performance measurement program has been for the agency.
From page 87...
... Literature Review Summary 87 17. Smart Links, Liveable Cities: 2017 Sustainability Report Author(s)
From page 88...
... 88 Social and Economic Sustainability Performance Measures for Public Transportation: Final Guidance Document 18. SEP-TAINABLE Author(s)
From page 89...
... Literature Review Summary 89 19. TransLink 2017 Accountability Report: Creating a More Livable Region Author(s)
From page 90...
... 90 Social and Economic Sustainability Performance Measures for Public Transportation: Final Guidance Document 20. BART Sustainability Action Plan: Final Report and Transit-Oriented Development Policy Performance Measures and Targets Author(s)
From page 91...
... Literature Review Summary 91 performance measures are identified in the report for each action item. The plan references that the BART operations department reports quarterly on a variety of safety and performance indicators.
From page 92...
... 92 Social and Economic Sustainability Performance Measures for Public Transportation: Final Guidance Document 21. CSR Report 2017 Author(s)
From page 93...
... Literature Review Summary 93 22. Transit Advisory Committee for Safety (TRACS)
From page 94...
... 94 Social and Economic Sustainability Performance Measures for Public Transportation: Final Guidance Document • Easily understood by those who collect and analyze them, • Capable of data quality control and verification, and • Manageable in terms of the total set of measures, metrics and indicators. The committee recommends using a combination of leading (also referred to as input)
From page 95...
... Literature Review Summary 95 • Providing guidance and clarity to transit agencies on requirements for collection of safety performance measures while considering differences in size and mode of agencies; • Continuing to collect security-related event data; • Increased granularity of reportable data; • Developing new reporting systems; and • Providing guidance and clarity on requirements for collection of safety performance measures. Key Points All agencies collect minimum safety data to meet current FTA and Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
From page 96...
... 96 Social and Economic Sustainability Performance Measures for Public Transportation: Final Guidance Document 23. How Is Metro Measuring Up?
From page 97...
... Literature Review Summary 97 24. Caltrans Strategic Management Plan, 2015–2020 Author(s)
From page 98...
... 98 Social and Economic Sustainability Performance Measures for Public Transportation: Final Guidance Document Key Points The Caltrans Strategic Plan provides a good example of a well-developed set of agency goals with corresponding performance measures. However, the fact that Caltrans has yet to develop the accessibility, livability, prosperity, and resiliency performance metrics underscores the difficulty in establishing a methodology to assign scores to these livability factors.
From page 99...
... Literature Review Summary 99 25. King County Metro 2014 Sustainability Plan Progress Report Author(s)
From page 100...
... 100 Social and Economic Sustainability Performance Measures for Public Transportation: Final Guidance Document 26. Social Sustainability Guidelines and Metrics for Transportation in Louisville: A Proposal for TARC's APTA Sustainability Commitment Author(s)
From page 101...
... Literature Review Summary 101 27. Sustainability Report 2013 Author(s)
From page 102...
... 102 Social and Economic Sustainability Performance Measures for Public Transportation: Final Guidance Document 28. Sustainability Reporting Handbook Author(s)
From page 103...
... Literature Review Summary 103 The handbook includes several appendices, including an indicator metadata sheet. The following table presents an example from the handbook that demonstrates the standard format and layout of the metadata sheets: Source: TransLink (2011)
From page 104...
... 104 Social and Economic Sustainability Performance Measures for Public Transportation: Final Guidance Document 29. Ten Years of Transparency: The Role of Performance Reporting at WSDOT -- Overview and Lessons Learned, 2001-2011 Author(s)
From page 105...
... Literature Review Summary 105 for non-experts -- whether elected, citizen-stakeholders, or others -- to easily grasp the findings and trends. Key Points The lessons learned from WSDOT, long a leader in performance management among state DOTs, include the importance of clear communication to support and expand a performance management program.

Key Terms



This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.