Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

Appendix B: Studies of the Accuracy of the Near Earth Asteroid Thermal Model
Pages 51-53

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 51...
... (2018) investigated the performances of the NEATM and the FRM in a study of 1 million synthetic, thermophysically generated NEOs with physical properties, spin vectors, and observational circumstances randomly selected from within realistic bounds.1 They concluded that the NEATM provides statistically more robust diameter estimates for solar phase angles less than ~65 degrees.
From page 52...
... compared the performances of the NEATM and the Standard Thermal Model (STM) on thermal-infrared fluxes of 1,517 main-belt asteroids taken from the IRAS and MSX catalogues, finding that the STM underestimates asteroid diameters by ~10 percent and the NEATM underestimates diameters by ~4 percent when compared to radar- and occultation-derived diameters.
From page 53...
... Masiero, C.R. Nugent, et al., 2016, NEOWISE Diameters and Albedos V1.0, NASA Planetary Data System 247, https://sbn.psi.edu/pds/resource/neowisediam.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.