Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:


Pages 35-44

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 35...
... 35 A P P E N D I X A Matrix of Factors Discussed in Freight Prioritization by Information Source
From page 36...
... Potential Factors Literature Review Survey Case Examples Assets owned State-owned assets that are involved in freight movement, including roads, rail lines, ships and seaports, aviation, and intermodal connectivity facilities Forty-one respondents from the survey answered a question on freight asset ownership. Findings indicate that an average of 35% of freight assets are owned by states, including the asset categories of airports, seaports, rail, and inland ports.
From page 37...
... Thirty-nine respondents answered questions on methods for general freight project prioritization. The highest marks for critical importance of method used went to "performance measures analysis" at 62%, "project readiness scores" at 62%, and "datadriven current and future freight deficiency analysis" at 54%.
From page 38...
... As a barrier to effective freight project prioritization, 24% thought that lack of staff resources is a somewhat significant barrier, 16% thought that it is a very significant barrier, and 59% thought that it was not a significant barrier at all. Project evaluation -- research for the development and implementation of performance measures to evaluate effectiveness, efficiencies, and performance Of 40 respondents to a question on the importance of freight data in freight project prioritization and evaluation, 63% agreed that it was necessary to improve freight project prioritization processes; and 45% thought that it would help to develop a broader multimodal project selection framework.
From page 39...
... Agency organization While many agencies reported that they have the flexibility and independence to implement new freight project prioritization methods and strategies (66%) , they also indicated that they sometimes do not have the necessary information to effectively measure performance and prioritize freight projects (42%–58%)
From page 40...
... Urban land use Projects were already dedicated to long-haul freight use. As a factor in freight project prioritization, 68% of respondents indicated that urban land use is somewhat important, 24% indicated that it is critical, 5% indicated that it is not important at all, and 3% indicated that they don't know.
From page 41...
... Partnerships in the decision-making process As a method, cooperative and coordinated freight partnerships were rated as somewhat important by 59% of respondents, with 23% finding them critical, and 18% finding them not important at all. As a resource barrier, lack of coordinated scheduling of cost and benefit assessments across freight stakeholders was rated as not significant at all by 33% of respondents, somewhat significant by 39%, and very significant by 28%.
From page 42...
... Private industry On the question of barriers to freight planning processes, 53% of respondents felt that gathering the needs assessment inputs from the private sector was a somewhat significant barrier to the freight planning process, while 21% found that it was a significant barrier, and 26% found it was not a significant barrier. Private industry does not play much of a role in the decision-making process but is represented by members on the technical advisory committees and freight advisory committees.
From page 43...
... Qualitative vs. quantitative balance There is a nice mix of qualitative vs.
From page 44...
... Data sources and gaps According to survey respondents, private data sources with types of data that include commodities (63%) , capital investment (45%)

Key Terms



This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.