Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

3 Changing Expectations for Teaching and Learning
Pages 39-62

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 39...
... Chapter 2 examined key factors contributing to this changing landscape and concurrent shifts in expectations for teaching and learning: federal legislation, national standards, and changing student demographics. This chapter looks at some aspects of those areas in further detail, elaborating on content area standards, especially their promotion of deeper learning; examining the increasing emphasis on the role of culture in learning; and considering ways in which technological advances have changed expectations about how teachers communicate with students and families.
From page 40...
... The first section in this chapter looks closely at pedagogies for deeper learning as recommended by recent standards (both general and discipline-specific)
From page 41...
... As briefly described above, the shift to student-centered approaches requires teachers to optimize learning environments to achieve the goals of deeper learning. To ensure that students with disabilities have access to these optimized learning experiences, teachers may need additional guidance on accommodations and assistive technologies, strategies for differentiating instruction and TABLE 3-1  Deeper Learning Versus Traditional Classroom Practices Role of Learner in Deeper Learning Role of Learner in Traditional Classroom Practices Connect new ideas and concepts to Course material treated as disconnected from previous knowledge and experience.
From page 42...
... , the urgency for schools and teachers to provide learning experiences that meet these needs will continue to grow. Below, the committee analyzes the changing demands on teachers, who are increasingly asked to provide deeper learning experiences and environments that function differently from traditional classrooms.
From page 43...
... participate productively in scientific practices and discourse. While the four proficiency strands were informed by scientific practices found in previous national science education documents, they also represented a departure from previous recommendations in that they indicated that the practices of science were inextricably linked to content knowledge.
From page 44...
... A recent study of teachers who were implementing instruction aligned to the NGSS found shifts from "simply presenting information to supporting students building explanations of phenomena and proposing BOX 3-1 What Can Deeper Learning in Science Look Like? In 2012, the National Research Council released A Framework for K–12 Sci ence Education (the Framework)
From page 45...
... . An example of a three-dimensional performance expectation and students engaging in instruction aligned to the performance expectation can be found in Box 3-1.
From page 46...
... Published first in 1989 and then revised in 2000, the Principles and Standards for School Mathematics included two kinds of standards: content standards in a number of mathematical domains (i.e., what students should learn) and process standards (i.e., how students should be supported to learn mathematics with understanding)
From page 47...
... In 2010, the Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts and Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects (CCSSELA) were published.
From page 48...
... The fictional dialogue below provides an example of what questions middle school students might consider as they work through a problem. The dialogue among Sam, Dana, and Anita provides teachers with the opportunity to meet new goals for math education that emphasize conceptual understanding, making sense of problems, constructing viable arguments and reasoning with others, and prompting deeper learning opportunities for students than traditional instructional approaches to math learning, which may have fo cused more on procedural fluency.
From page 49...
... There are strong similarities between the disciplinary practices in Figure 3-1 and five skill sets important to the success of individuals in the 21st century (NRC, 2010) and the deeper learning practices (Sawyer, 2006)
From page 50...
... perspectives and cultures.   FIGURE 3-1  Common Core State Standards practices for Mathematics and English Language Arts and science and engineering practices for the Next Generation Science Standards.
From page 51...
... . As with previous guidance documents for state social studies standards, the C3 Framework focused on broader concepts that underlie a rich program for social studies education, but did not include recommendations for specific content to be covered, leaving those decisions to states as they develop standards.
From page 52...
... Simultaneously, expectations for social studies teaching have increased: teachers are expected to be able to integrate social studies with other subject areas (namely language arts) , to move beyond lecture and rote learning and instead conduct collaborative activities and to help students engage in deeper learning.
From page 53...
... . This finding suggests that wellaligned instructional materials play a critical role in providing students with opportunities to engage in the disciplinary practices for mathematics that correlate with deeper learning.
From page 54...
... . Without concentrated efforts to support teachers with high-quality, well-aligned instructional materials, teachers will continue to utilize valuable planning time to search for lessons or units, which may lead to inconsistencies in the quality of materials and impact student performance (Opfer et al., 2018)
From page 55...
... Research from the broader field of inclusive education7 may offer insights into the variety of approaches that can successfully involve students from a wide range of diverse backgrounds and abilities learning alongside their peers in school settings. Adoption of these approaches can help teachers to better meet the needs of all students (Loreman, 1999)
From page 56...
... . Contemporary views on teaching and learning in mathematics, science, ELA, and social studies support more expansive ways of knowing by engaging students in a variety of sense-making opportunities and encourage teachers to allow students to exhibit their sense-making in diverse ways (i.e., discourse, writing, drawing)
From page 57...
... ADVANCES IN TECHNOLOGY AND FAMILY COMMUNICATION Alongside changes in expectations for teaching precipitated by emphases on deeper learning and culturally responsive pedagogies, changes in technology are shaping the work of teachers and expectations about what happens in and outside of the classroom. Across schools, districts, and states, disparities and inequities related to learning technologies can take different forms; two important ones include access (learning technologies available to some schools and their students, but not others)
From page 58...
... Teachers have seen recommendations for teaching and learning shift as cognitive and learning scientists learn more about how students learn. They have also seen changes in the standards whereby disciplinary practices are given equal weight to disciplinary content knowledge, with a strengthened emphasis on the integration of content standards and disciplinary practices.
From page 59...
... . Deeper Learning: Improving Students Outcomes for Col lege, Career, and Civic Life.
From page 60...
... . A History of Elementary Social Studies: Romance and Reality.
From page 61...
... . Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts and Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects.
From page 62...
... . The Status of Elementary Science Education: Are We Ready for the Next Generation Science Standards?


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.