Skip to main content

Measuring Success in Substance Use Grant Programs Outcomes and Metrics for Improvement (2020) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:

Summary
Pages 1-8

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 1...
... Congress and commissioned by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA)
Read the entire page →
From page 2...
... RECOMMENDATIONS The following outcomes and metrics may assist SAMHSA in achieving success with respect to the two prevention grant programs, FR-CARA and OD Treatment Access. Recommendation 2-1: The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Ser vices Administration (SAMHSA)
Read the entire page →
From page 3...
... Recommendation 2-4: The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Ser vices Administration should provide support to grantees to engage survivors of overdose in a full range of harm-reduction services (including syringe services programs and naloxone distribution ser vices) and collect data on how many of these individuals end up engaging in harm-reduction services (e.g., number of individuals receiving a naloxone kit following an overdose event)
Read the entire page →
From page 4...
... These data should be used by grantees to better understand and treat beneficiaries of the grant and interpret the success of their programs and by SAMHSA to tailor future grant funding involving those with a history of exposure to traumatic events and history of PTSD diagnosis. Recommendation 3-2: The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration should amend data-collection and report
Read the entire page →
From page 5...
... Recommendation 3-4: The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Ser vices Administration should implement a validated and psychometri cally sound tool for assessing recovery among clients of its grant programs, as the Center for Substance Abuse Treatment Government Performance Results and Modernization Act tool does not elicit ade quate data on the process of recovery. Recommendation 3-5: The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Ser vices Administration should include measurements about uninten tional and intentional overdose events in its grant reporting tools (e.g., number of events in a given period, outcome of overdose events, first or non-first overdose event)
Read the entire page →
From page 6...
... This could include surveys of stakeholders impacted by the grant or use of administrative data to determine changes made at the local and state levels in response to grantee activities. Recommendation 3-12: The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration should support grantees in measuring and reporting how peer recovery services have impacted the overall recovery process for clients served by the Building Communities of Recovery grant.
Read the entire page →
From page 7...
... as well as outcomes of child delivery. • The number and percent increase in number of child protective services referrals to a PPW treatment case manager.
Read the entire page →

Key Terms

  • vices administration
  • grant programs
  • postpartum women
  • support grantees
  • grant program

  • building communities
  • state pilot
  • responder training
  • pilot grant
  • grant funding

  • overdose treatment
  • state programs
  • abuse treatment
  • programs management
  • treatment government

  • treatment access
  • management reporting
  • overdose rates
  • ing success
  • reporting tools

  • reporting tool
  • following outcomes
  • performance results
  • assist samhsa
  • women grant

  • prevention grant
  • grant reporting
  • future grant
  • support programs
  • services programs


    • This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
    More information on Chapter Skim is available.