Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:


Pages 77-100

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 77...
... B-1 A P P E N D I X B Survey Responses Responding Agencies Agencies responding to the survey are shown in the map below. Appendix B1 -- Summary Table One large summary table provides the responses to all questions for all respondents.
From page 78...
... B-2 Advancements in Use of Geophysical Methods for Transportation Projects Appendix B1 -- Summary Table
From page 79...
... All Agencies Agencies w/o Geophysics Experience Question: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Agency Geophysics? Why Not Geophysics?
From page 80...
... All Agencies Agencies w/o Geophysics Experience Question: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Agency Geophysics? Why Not Geophysics?
From page 81...
... Survey Responses B-5 Question: 17a 17b 17c 17d 17e 19a 19b 19c 20a 20b 20c 20d 20e Agency FWHA Manual Synthesis 357 EDC-5 TRC EC130 ASTM AASHTO NHI Webinar GEC Specific methods Applications Field Procedures Interpretation Case Histories Alabama 2 2 3 2 2 5 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 Alaska 2 2 1 1 2 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 Arizona 3 2 2 2 3 2 3 3 2 2 2 1 2 Arkansas 1 1 3 3 2 5 5 5 2 3 2 2 3 California 3 3 3 3 3 5 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 Colorado 3 3 2 3 3 5 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 Connecticut 3 1 2 2 3 4 4 5 3 3 2 2 2 Delaware #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A Florida 3 2 3 2 3 5 4 4 3 3 2 3 3 Georgia 2 2 1 1 2 5 5 5 3 3 2 3 3 Hawaii 2 1 2 1 1 4 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 Idaho #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A Illinois 3 1 2 1 2 5 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 Indiana 3 2 3 2 1 5 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 Iowa 2 1 2 1 1 5 5 4 3 3 2 3 3 Kansas 2 1 2 2 2 4 3 4 2 2 3 3 3 Kentucky 2 2 1 2 2 5 4 4 3 2 2 3 1 Louisiana 1 1 3 1 1 5 3 5 2 3 3 3 3 Maine 1 #N/A 1 #N/A 1 5 4 4 3 3 3 2 3 Maryland 3 3 3 3 3 5 5 4 3 3 3 3 3 Massachusetts 2 2 2 1 1 4 3 4 1 3 2 3 3 Michigan 2 2 2 1 2 4 4 4 2 2 2 3 3 Minnesota 3 3 2 3 3 4 4 4 2 2 3 3 3 Mississippi 2 1 1 1 3 1 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 Missouri 3 2 3 2 2 5 4 3 2 3 2 2 3 Montana 3 2 3 1 3 5 4 5 3 3 2 3 3 Nebraska #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A Nevada 2 2 1 1 3 3 1 5 3 3 3 3 3 New Hampshire 3 3 3 3 3 5 5 5 3 3 3 3 2 New Jersey 3 3 2 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 All Agencies
From page 82...
... B-6 Advancements in Use of Geophysical Methods for Transportation Projects Question: 17a 17b 17c 17d 17e 19a 19b 19c 20a 20b 20c 20d 20e Agency FWHA Manual Synthesis 357 EDC-5 TRC EC130 ASTM AASHTO NHI Webinar GEC Specific methods Applications Field Procedures Interpretation Case Histories New Mexico 3 3 2 1 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 2 2 New York 2 2 2 1 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 North Carolina 1 3 3 1 2 5 4 5 3 3 3 3 3 North Dakota 2 2 3 2 2 5 4 5 3 3 3 3 2 Ohio 3 3 3 3 3 5 5 5 3 2 3 3 2 Oklahoma 2 2 2 2 2 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Oregon 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 5 2 3 2 3 3 Pennsylvania 2 1 1 1 1 5 6 5 2 3 3 3 3 Rhode Island #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A South Carolina 3 1 3 1 3 5 4 4 3 3 2 3 2 South Dakota 3 1 3 1 2 4 3 4 2 2 2 3 2 Tennessee 3 3 2 3 3 5 5 4 3 3 3 3 3 Texas 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 3 2 3 3 3 3 Utah #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A Vermont 3 3 3 2 3 5 4 3 2 3 2 3 3 Virginia 3 2 1 3 3 4 4 4 2 2 2 2 3 Washington 2 1 2 1 2 5 4 3 3 3 2 3 2 West Virginia #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A Wisconsin 3 3 2 3 3 5 4 5 3 3 3 3 3 Wyoming 3 2 1 1 2 4 5 5 2 3 3 3 3 D.C. 2 1 2 1 2 4 5 5 3 3 3 2 3 Puerto Rico 2 2 2 2 2 5 5 4 2 3 2 3 3 Central Federal Land 3 3 3 2 3 4 2 5 3 3 3 3 2 Eastern Federal Land #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A Western Federal Lan 3 2 2 2 3 5 4 3 2 3 2 3 2 Total Respondents 48 47 48 47 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 All Agencies
From page 83...
... Survey Responses B-7 Appendix B2 -- Key for Summary Table with Response Counts
From page 84...
... B-8 Advancements in Use of Geophysical Methods for Transportation Projects Question 1 Has your agency used geophysical methods for geotechnical site investigation? Key 48 Yes 1 43 90% No 2 5 10% I'm not sure.
From page 85...
... Survey Responses B-9 Question 4 In the past five years, about how frequently has your agency applied geophysical methods on average? Key 43 One time per year or less 1 9 21% Two times per year 2 9 21% Three to five times per year 3 12 28% Six to ten times per year 4 5 12% More than ten times per year 5 7 16% I don't know.
From page 86...
... B-10 Advancements in Use of Geophysical Methods for Transportation Projects Question 7 Which geophysical methods has your agency used? Please select all that apply.
From page 87...
... Survey Responses B-11 Question 8 For which applications has your agency applied geophysical methods? Please select all that apply.
From page 88...
... B-12 Advancements in Use of Geophysical Methods for Transportation Projects Question 9 For which geologic investigation objectives has your agency applied geophysical methods? Please select all that apply.
From page 89...
... Survey Responses B-13 Question 12 Considering the past five years, about how much has your agency spent on geophysical investigations on average each year? Key 43 0 to $50,000 1 16 37% $50,001 to $100,000 2 7 16% $100,001 to $150,000 3 8 19% $150,001 to $250,000 4 1 2% $250,001 to $500,000 5 3 7% More than $500,000 6 1 2% I don't know.
From page 90...
... B-14 Advancements in Use of Geophysical Methods for Transportation Projects Question 16 What types of contracts have been used to procure geophysical investigation services? Please select all that apply.
From page 91...
... Survey Responses B-15 Question 19a Please indicate how likely in-person training (e.g. NHI course)
From page 92...
... B-16 Advancements in Use of Geophysical Methods for Transportation Projects Question 20a Please indicate how useful each of the following content areas would be for new training or guidance resources: (a) Technical background of specific geophysical methods Key 48 Not useful 1 1 2% %83812lufesutahwemoS Very useful 3 29 60% I don't know.
From page 93...
... Survey Responses B-17 Appendix B3 -- Responses to Short Answer Questions
From page 94...
... B-18 Advancements in Use of Geophysical Methods for Transportation Projects North Dakota Use of Ground Penetrating Radar on a Mine and Blend Paving contract to use GPR to determine existing Asphalt and Base thicknesses provided incorrect information leading to a claim by the contractor Oklahoma Many engineers are satisfied with current, well-established procedures and resistant to significant change. (Note: this response was counted under the "agency inertia" answer, rather than as "other.)
From page 95...
... Survey Responses B-19 California http://dot.ca.gov/hq/esc/geotech/geo_manual/manual.html Colorado Uploaded document. Maine Uploaded document.
From page 96...
... B-20 Advancements in Use of Geophysical Methods for Transportation Projects Virginia We use geophysics via our professional on-call contracts to evaluate almost all of our prominent projects. It would be hard to itemize the effective use of such methods in this text box.
From page 97...
... Survey Responses B-21 Alabama Have on-going research project with Auburn University to help us learn how to utilize the equipment and technology on transportation projects. At the conclusion of the research, we will receive further instruction on the technology.
From page 98...
... B-22 Advancements in Use of Geophysical Methods for Transportation Projects Alaska My experience with geophysical methods has been that it is greatly oversold and the benefits are not as "clear" as promised. In my opinion it would be a good idea to address the limitations so that these methods are not used in situations where they are not appropriate, because in those cases it only reduces the likelihood of being used again.
From page 99...
... Abbreviations and acronyms used without definitions in TRB publications: A4A Airlines for America AAAE American Association of Airport Executives AASHO American Association of State Highway Officials AASHTO American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials ACI–NA Airports Council International–North America ACRP Airport Cooperative Research Program ADA Americans with Disabilities Act APTA American Public Transportation Association ASCE American Society of Civil Engineers ASME American Society of Mechanical Engineers ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials ATA American Trucking Associations CTAA Community Transportation Association of America CTBSSP Commercial Truck and Bus Safety Synthesis Program DHS Department of Homeland Security DOE Department of Energy EPA Environmental Protection Agency FAA Federal Aviation Administration FAST Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act (2015) FHWA Federal Highway Administration FMCSA Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration FRA Federal Railroad Administration FTA Federal Transit Administration HMCRP Hazardous Materials Cooperative Research Program IEEE Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers ISTEA Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 ITE Institute of Transportation Engineers MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (2012)
From page 100...
... A dvancem ents in U se of G eophysical M ethods for Transportation Projects N CH RP Synthesis 547 TRB TRA N SPO RTATIO N RESEA RCH BO A RD 500 Fifth Street, N W W ashington, D C 20001 A D D RESS SERV ICE REQ U ESTED N O N -PR O FIT O R G .

Key Terms



This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.