The National Academies Press

Currently Skimming:

Pages 163-180

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.

From page 163... ... A P P E N D I X G Documentation for Integrated Corridor Management Deployments G-1 While ICM projects are centered on stakeholder coordination, the ICM system (ICMS) provides the backbone that enables centralized data collection, incident detection, response plan implementation and automatic information dissemination. Read the entire page →
From page 164... ... G-2 Broadening Integrated Corridor Management Stakeholders Increasing utilization of Red Line capacity with the potential of additional train cars or decreased headways. The Dallas U.S.-75 ICMS integrated various regional and municipal systems and operations using a decentralized approach. Read the entire page →
From page 165... ... Documentation for Integrated Corridor Management Deployments G-3 TABLE G.1. Expert rules for response plan recommendation. Read the entire page →
From page 166... ... G-4 Broadening Integrated Corridor Management Stakeholders FIGURE G.1. Response plan J75N260 AM -- diversion plan (Implementable Response Plans for Stage 3, Texas A&M Transportation Institute, November 18, 2013, page 84, unpublished) Read the entire page →
From page 167... ... Documentation for Integrated Corridor Management Deployments G-5 FIGURE G.2. Response plan J75N260 AM -- required actions. Read the entire page →
From page 168... ... G-6 Broadening Integrated Corridor Management Stakeholders Upgrades to selected traffic signal systems (new traffic signal coordination timings, responsive traffic signal control) Read the entire page →
From page 169... ... Documentation for Integrated Corridor Management Deployments G-7 FIGURE G.4. San Diego I-15 Integrated Corridor Management system inputs and outputs (San Diego I-15 Demonstration Integrated Corridor Management System PATH Report on Stage 3: Site Demonstration and Evaluation, UCB-ITS-PRR-2015-03, page 32.) Read the entire page →
From page 170... ... G-8 Broadening Integrated Corridor Management Stakeholders Divisions of San Diego, Poway, and Escondido; Metropolitan Transit System (MTS) and North County Transit District (NCTD) Read the entire page →
From page 171... ... Documentation for Integrated Corridor Management Deployments G-9 rely on how quickly field elements can be changed (e.g., the stakeholders are required to have time to actually implement recommended signal timing plans) Read the entire page →
From page 172... ... G-10 Broadening Integrated Corridor Management Stakeholders FIGURE G.8. Example response plan for northbound afternoon peak-period congestion at Rancho Bernardo Rd (I-15 ICM III -- PDT Meeting #59, San Diego Association of Governments, July 15, 2015, page 28, unpublished) Read the entire page →
From page 173... ... Documentation for Integrated Corridor Management Deployments G-11 FIGURE G.9. Geographic limits of the Kansas I-35 Integrated Corridor Management project (MidAmerica Regional Council) Read the entire page →
From page 174... ... G-12 Broadening Integrated Corridor Management Stakeholders 3. Use Cases -- To scope the Concept of Operations clearly, one Use Case was selected to be thoroughly analyzed. Read the entire page →
From page 175... ... Documentation for Integrated Corridor Management Deployments G-13 TABLE G.3. User needs. Read the entire page →
From page 176... ... G-14 Broadening Integrated Corridor Management Stakeholders TABLE G.4. Operational needs. Read the entire page →
From page 177... ... Documentation for Integrated Corridor Management Deployments G-15 ID # Driving User Need ID # Title Description/Rationale ON8 UN4 Access to multimodal options Provide tools for regional awareness of multimodal options, including last mile connections from transit. This would include the Transportation Hubs under development through the Ride KC effort, and third-party transportation services such as ZipCars, Uber Share, and B-Cycle facilities. Read the entire page →
From page 178... ... G-16 Broadening Integrated Corridor Management Stakeholders ID # Driving User Need ID # Title Description/Rationale is to provide accurate and timely information on available transportation systems, their performance, and peak congestion times and days so people can adjust their travel patterns. Source: Mid-America Regional Council. Read the entire page →
From page 179... ... Documentation for Integrated Corridor Management Deployments G-17 Strategy # Priority Topic Area Theme ICM Initiatives and Strategies Operational Needs Addressed 6 1 Operational Arterial Integration Enhancement of the Operation Green Light Program in Kansas City. ON2, ON3, ON5, ON10, ON11, ON12, ON14 7 2 Technical Integration Multi-Modal All-Inclusive Transportation Dashboard. Read the entire page →

From page 163...

... A P P E N D I X G Documentation for Integrated Corridor Management Deployments G-1 While ICM projects are centered on stakeholder coordination, the ICM system (ICMS) provides the backbone that enables centralized data collection, incident detection, response plan implementation and automatic information dissemination.