Broadening Integrated Corridor Management Stakeholders (2020) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:
Pages 23-30
The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.
From page 23... ...
23 The objectives and scale of the ICM project will help transportation decisionmakers determine who will be directly or indirectly affected and which stakeholder entities could make good partners. The difference between ICM partners and stakeholders is that ICM partners would be required to support an ICM project through planning, deployment, and operations/ maintenance.
|
From page 24... ...
24 Broadening Integrated Corridor Management Stakeholders • Marine terminal operators (MTOs) – MTOs offer wharfage, dock, warehouse, or other marine terminal facilities to serve ocean carriers, providing the link for goods between ocean carriers and motor carriers.
|
From page 25... ...
Determine Potential Partners 25 • Rail, bus, ferry, private shuttle, streetcar, paratransit agencies – Transit is not limited to bus service. Different modes of public transportation that operate within a corridor may include, but are not limited to, rail, bus, ferry, private shuttle, street car, or paratransit.
|
From page 26... ...
26 Broadening Integrated Corridor Management Stakeholders ICM corridor, it may make sense to keep them informed of ICM activities given that they are responsible for performing traffic checkpoint operations, transportation checks, and so forth. • Coroner's office – When a traffic incident results in a fatality, the coroner's office is involved to perform autopsies, pathological and toxicological analyses, and inquests relating to the investigation of deaths to determine the cause of and responsibility for the death.
|
From page 27... ...
Determine Potential Partners 27 • Operations-Level Decisionmakers – The entities with choices to make regarding ICM operations and strategies to enact during various circumstances; or • Program-Level Decisionmakers – The higher level staff that set policies and investment priorities for an organization, entity, or group. Because all of these decisionmakers play crucial roles in the deployment, operation, and overall success of ICM, all three types are identified, considered, and discussed below in regard to their roles as ICM decisionmakers.
|
From page 28... ...
28 Broadening Integrated Corridor Management Stakeholders committees, advisory panels, or executive boards for each stakeholder group. Program-level decisionmakers can also include even higher level policy-setting or policy-influencing entities and organizations, which may be identified by tracing funding sources for each stakeholder group.
|
From page 29... ...
Determine Potential Partners 29 Operations-level and end-user decisionmakers need to be engaged when deliberating ICM strategy options. This may begin during the development of the Concept of Operations for the ICM system (ICMS)
|
From page 30... ...
30 Broadening Integrated Corridor Management Stakeholders • Establishing freight coalitions at the DOT, holding a regional operations forum, or leveraging existing relationships that other agencies already have (e.g., MPOs, chambers of commerce) can be used to identify major freight stakeholders and subsequently engage them.
|
Key Terms
This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More
information on Chapter Skim is available.