Skip to main content

Critical Findings on COVID-19 Select Publications from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2021) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:

Evidence-Based Practice for Public Health Emergency Preparedness and Response
Pages 75-78

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 75...
... This process was intended to result in a methodology that would be applicable across the full range of PHEPR practices. The resulting report, Evidence-Based Practice for Public Health Emergency Preparedness and Response, presents recommendations intended to transform the infrastructure, funding, and methods of PHEPR research and provides evidence-based practice recommendations and/or implementation guidance for PHEPR practitioners relating to: • Engaging with and training community-based partners to improve the outcomes of at-risk populations after public health emergencies • Activating a public health emergency operations center • Communicating public health alerts and guidance with technical audiences during a public health emergency • Implementing quarantine to reduce or stop the spread of a contagious disease
Read the entire page →
From page 76...
... science as a unique researcher and practitioner academic discipline within training and education public health Due to its role as the funding agency with the primary mission responsi bility in PHEPR, the committee con cluded that CDC should take the lead PHEPR evidence-based guidelines group to Capacity building for translation, in developing and implementing develop guidelines for PHEPR practice and dissemination, and implementation of the proposed National PHEPR Sci communicate key evidence gaps research to practice ence Framework. CDC's role would System leadership to include establishing an authority and transform how PHEPR research process for supporting high-quality, is coordinated, sustainably funded, and conducted rigorous, and sustainable research before, during, and after emergen Cross-cutting, forward-looking cies.
Read the entire page →
From page 77...
... The gap between PHEPR research and practice can be narrowed by training researchers in translation and implementation science and supporting workforce development programs that strengthen the implementation capacity of public health agencies. CONCLUSION Research and continuous learning should become the expectation, not the exception, for the PHEPR field.
Read the entire page →
From page 78...
... Quinn University of California, Los Angeles University of Maryland School of Public Health Francisco García Pima County and Paul Shekelle University of Arizona Rand Corporation Paul K Halverson Andy Stergachis Indiana University University of Washington Sean Hennessy Mitchell Stripling University of Pennsylvania Planned Parenthood Federation of America Edbert Hsu Johns Hopkins University Steven M
Read the entire page →

Key Terms

  • phepr practices
  • health emergency
  • health emergencies
  • evidence base
  • emergency preparedness

  • national phepr
  • phepr science
  • science framework
  • phepr evidence
  • health agencies

  • phepr practitioners
  • phepr researchers
  • evidence reviews
  • proposed national
  • save lives

  • associate program
  • fragmented phepr
  • advance phepr
  • phepr practice
  • future phepr

  • concerning phepr
  • quality phepr
  • prioritized phepr
  • phepr knowledge
  • phepr practitioner

  • selected phepr
  • ing phepr
  • integrated phepr
  • existing phepr
  • evaluating phepr


    • This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
    More information on Chapter Skim is available.