Skip to main content

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Interventions to Prevent and Address Sexual Harassment Proceedings of a Workshop (2021) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:

Evaluation in Action:Examples and Resources
Pages 39-46

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 39...
... Additionally, this chapter offers resources for applying implementation science to the evaluation of sexual harassment prevention efforts. EXAMPLES OF EFFORTS TO EVALUATE SEXUAL HARASSMENT INTERVENTIONS Michael Leiter, Acadia University and Deakin University, provided the first of three examples of evidence-based efforts to evaluate sexual harassment interventions.
Read the entire page →
From page 40...
... The current evaluation uses public health approaches to prevention, based on data to define the problem, inform solutions, make course corrections, and measure outcomes. The evaluation begins with the start of the project, involves multiple methods, actively engages the target audience, and uses a variety of indicators to measure outcomes.
Read the entire page →
From page 41...
... . Workshop presentation.
Read the entire page →
From page 42...
... Kwon discussed the program's evaluation process, which includes determining short-, intermediate-, and long-term outcomes of prevention programs and survivor support programs; developing goals of training and other programs; examining existing evaluation questions; mapping existing evaluation questions onto outcomes; identifying indicators for each outcome; developing new survey questions to fill gaps; designing new interview and focus group questions; and creating a "menu" of evaluation questions. The evaluation "menu" allows for individual program managers to pull from a list of questions to support their evaluation (see Figure 6-2)
Read the entire page →
From page 43...
... . Workshop presentation.
Read the entire page →
From page 44...
... The commissioned paper by Raechel Soicher, Oregon State University,1 provides several such examples, including resources that outline how to apply models of implementation science to the evaluation of sexual harassment prevention efforts. In addition, Appendix E includes resources and worksheets based on these models.
Read the entire page →
From page 45...
... These resources are select examples of implementation science frameworks and models that can be used as a guide for higher education institutions in applying implementation science to evaluation of sexual harassment prevention efforts. Additional information about these and other models can be found in the commissioned paper by Soicher.2 2 Available: https://www.nap.edu/catalog/26279.
Read the entire page →

Key Terms

  • harassment prevention
  • prevention efforts
  • implementation science
  • evaluate sexual
  • evaluation questions

  • social norms
  • existing evaluation
  • applying implementation
  • workplace environments
  • guiding questions

  • oregon state
  • noaa workplace
  • measure outcomes
  • logic model
  • program evaluation

  • implementation research
  • implementation strategies
  • robust implementation
  • evaluation process
  • improve implementation

  • prevention program
  • implementation theories
  • implementation study
  • violence prevention
  • outcome evaluation

  • current evaluation
  • multiple implementation
  • identify sexual
  • evaluation design
  • prevention strategy


    • This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
    More information on Chapter Skim is available.