Skip to main content

Evaluating the Process to Develop the Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2020-2025 A Midcourse Report (2022) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:

5 Concluding Remarks
Pages 103-108

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 103...
... ADDRESSING THE FIVE VALUES To achieve the goal of trustworthiness, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (the National Academies) report Redesigning the Process for Establishing the Dietary Guidelines for Americans (2017 National Academies report)
Read the entire page →
From page 104...
... with timely feedback on their progress toward redesigning and improving the processes used to establish the DGA in response to the seven 2017 National Academies recommendations. Based on the committee's analysis, findings, and conclusions provided in Chapters 3 and 4, several overarching conclusions have been reached.
Read the entire page →
From page 105...
... Fifth, two other 2017 National Academies recommendations that were difficult to implement had challenges with lead time, namely the recommendations to strengthen food pattern modeling and to introduce systems-science approaches to the DGA process. Both of these recommendations will require investments in specially qualified personnel and new scientific approaches.
Read the entire page →
From page 106...
... FINAL REMARKS The committee concentrated on the specific recommendations contained in the 2017 National Academies report about the process for creating the DGA and has begun its examination of the role of systematic reviews in the development of recommendations for diet-related chronic disease. The 2017 National Academies report's proposed improvements to the processes for establishing the DGA were designed to create a process that is more effective and trustworthy.
Read the entire page →
From page 107...
... This would involve attending to some of the fine details noted by this committee as well as creating a framework within which the systematic reviews are developed, as described in the 2017 National Academies report (NASEM, 2017)
Read the entire page →

Key Terms

  • academies report
  • dietary guidelines
  • dga process
  • academies recommendations
  • five values

  • evidence base
  • guidelines advisory
  • systematic review
  • chronic disease
  • nutrition evidence

  • dga cycle
  • lead time
  • food pattern
  • health status
  • pattern modeling

  • committee acknowledged
  • public facing
  • proposed improvements
  • evidence library
  • disease outcomes

  • acadmies report
  • recommendations include
  • choosing studies
  • essential starting
  • committee noted

  • difficult undertaking
  • evidence systematic
  • involve improving
  • difficult challenges
  • appropriate technology


    • This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
    More information on Chapter Skim is available.