Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

Appendix A: Gathering and Assessing the Evidence
Pages 197-200

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 197...
... At the second public session, on May 13, 2021, the committee heard from the director of IES, Mark Schneider, who shared his vision for this study and how he intends to use and engage with this report. The committee also heard from Anne Ricciuti, deputy director of science, who explained the review process for NCER and NCSER competitions, and NCER and NCSER program officers Katherine Taylor, Jacquelyn Buckley, Allen Ruby, Erin Higgins, and Emily Doolittle, who discussed their roles and responsibilities.
From page 198...
... This panel included Carrie Conaway, senior lecturer at Harvard Graduate School of Education; Raymond Hart, director of research for the Council of Great City Schools; Emily House, executive director for the Tennessee Higher Education Commission; and Kylie Klein, director of research, accountability, and data in Evanston/ Skokie School District 65. The second practitioner panel focused on supporting beneficial research partnerships, and included Elaine Allensworth, Lewis-Sebring Director for the University of Chicago Consortium on School Research; Kingsley Botchway, chief of human resources and equity from the Waterloo Community School District; and Colin Chellman, university dean for institutional and policy research at the City University of New York.
From page 199...
... As noted above, published, peer-reviewed literature remains the gold standard by which the committee made its judgments. The committee also received formal public comment from multiple scholarly organizations and individuals, including the deans of the schools of education associated with the LEARN Coalition, the American Educational Research Association, the National Center for Learning Disabilities, and dozens of others.
From page 200...
... The redacted draft report contained the committee's understanding on matters of fact only: that is, IES staff were not privy to the committee's analytic work until after the report review process. Following a fact-checking process internal to IES, IES staff returned a set of comments and suggested edits.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.