Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:


Pages 4-10

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 4...
... 4 C H A P T E R 2 State Policies and Practices for Isolated Rural Intersection Lighting Approximately 70% of states reported that they have guidelines or policies to help decide where and how to implement lighting at isolated rural intersections (Figure 1)
From page 5...
... Warranting Issues 5   Figure 1. Responses to "Does your agency have any policies or guidance for determining where and how to implement isolated rural intersection lighting?
From page 6...
... 6 Lighting Practices for Isolated Rural Intersections Alternatives to Lighting at Isolated Rural Intersections Lighting is only one safety element that can be used at isolated rural intersections and, in some cases, may not be the preferred treatment. Table 1 summarizes findings about some of these alternatives from the published literature.
From page 7...
... Warranting Issues 7   Supplementary pavement markings • Could be considered before (Government of Alberta 2011) or in conjunction with (Green et al.
From page 8...
... 8 Lighting Practices for Isolated Rural Intersections Figure 5. Photograph of oversized reflective delineators along a curve adjacent to a rural roadway intersection, used as an alternative to lighting.
From page 9...
... Warranting Issues 9   Warranting Factor Notes and References Traffic volume • High traffic volume (Wright County [MN] 2002; New Mexico DOT 2020)
From page 10...
... 10 Lighting Practices for Isolated Rural Intersections been offered (Preston and Schoenecker 1999; FHWA 2012; Jefferson County [MO]

Key Terms



This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.