Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:


Pages 6-15

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 6...
... 6 This chapter reviews the literature identified as relevant to the question of load rating bridges and culverts with missing or incomplete as-built information. Such information can generally be categorized as having to do with diagnostic or proof load testing, NDT, and other pertinent studies.
From page 7...
... Literature Review 7   tests. Based on the results of the tests, the state updated the H15 load ratings to 1.24 and 1.97, respectively, for the concrete and the steel bridges.
From page 8...
... 8 Load Rating of Bridges and Culverts with Missing or Incomplete As-Built Information and high values for the initial prestressing force and the eccentricity for both H20 and HS-20 design loads, based on satisfying code requirements for midspan top and bottom stresses under initial and service load conditions. Using the load test results, ratings were completed for H20 and HS-20 loads under the low and high prestressing force and eccentricity assumptions.
From page 9...
... Literature Review 9   focused on the investigation of a specific bridge in South Carolina. The study included a diagnostic load test of the bridge, laboratory testing to failure of one channel beam, and load rating of the bridge based on the test results.
From page 10...
... 10 Load Rating of Bridges and Culverts with Missing or Incomplete As-Built Information determine in situ member conditions (e.g., concrete degradation and spalling, corrosion of internal steel reinforcement)
From page 11...
... Literature Review 11   from compression and hardness tests are more easily obtained because compression tests require relatively smaller bar size, and hardness tests are typically performed in situ. Gearhart reported the steel strength from these tests to be within 5 ksi of the actual strength.
From page 12...
... 12 Load Rating of Bridges and Culverts with Missing or Incomplete As-Built Information Other Studies In 2011, Taylor, Amini, and Lindt [51] reported load ratings of 16 Colorado county-owned concrete bridges with missing information -- 14 prestressed girder bridges and two reinforced concrete slab bridges.
From page 13...
... Literature Review 13   Bagheri et al.
From page 14...
... 14 Load Rating of Bridges and Culverts with Missing or Incomplete As-Built Information Study Bridge Type Plans Methods Rating Factors Yen and Zhou (1993)
From page 15...
... Literature Review 15   Source Title Contribution Jauregui, Weldon, and Aguilar [22] Load testing of bridges: proof load testing and the future of load testing Outlines a multistep process for load rating prestressed concrete bridges with missing information; includes three examples (double-T beam, box beam, and I-girder bridges)

Key Terms



This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.