Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

3 Potential Merits and Viability of Advanced Nuclear Reactors and Associated Fuel Cycles
Pages 53-82

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 53...
... (Chapter 4 provides more details on the development and infrastructure needed to support fuel cycles for advanced reactors.) The committee notes that an assessment of the cost competitiveness of advanced reactor systems as compared with other energy sources is beyond the scope of this study.
From page 54...
... DOE-NE has programs that support the development of the advanced reactor and associated fuel cycles, but it will have to make difficult decisions in the coming years based on budgetary constraints. Finally, while the advanced reactors under development have several potential merits, these have yet to be demonstrated, and there are no operating prototypes in the United States for any of these reactors.
From page 55...
... comparable to uranium-based fuels. 3.2 TYPES OF ADVANCED REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED FUEL CYCLES A large number of advanced reactors are being designed that differ significantly from the current fleet of thermal LWRs deployed in the United States.
From page 56...
... . DOE's framework for advanced reactors designs is similar to that of GIF, but DOE more highly prioritizes versatility compared with earlier reactor generations, especially the ability to provide nonelectrical services, such as desalination, process heat, and hydrogen production, as an additional goal of the advanced reactor designs.
From page 57...
... ADVANCED NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED FUEL CYCLES 57 FIGURE 3.1 Schematics of the six advanced reactor concepts in the Generation IV International Forum.
From page 58...
... As discussed in Section 3.5, cooperative activities involve use of materials testing reactors and other facilities for evaluation of advanced reactors' fuels and materials. To facilitate cooperation, INEPC can use bilateral technical collaboration arrangements, memorandums of understanding, technical action plans, the International Nuclear Energy Research Initiative (I-NERI)
From page 59...
... . Detailed technical design considerations, safety aspects, electricity generation, and nonelectricity applications of these advanced reactors are addressed in the parallel National Academies study Laying the Foundation for New and Advanced Nuclear Reactors.
From page 60...
... U/Steel HALEU OTC Once-through breed reactor (10–18.5% core and burn; closed fuel average) cycle via multirecycling ARC-100 U-Zr/Steel HALEU (10.9- OTC Closed fuel cycle via 15.5%)
From page 61...
... UC/TRISO/ HALEU (19.75%) OTC prismatic block a Primary fuel cycle as intended currently by the advanced reactor developers.
From page 62...
... . In the United States, as discussed in detail in Section 3.3.2, X-energy's Xe-100 has recently received more than $1 billion of support via DOE's Advanced Reactor Demonstration Program (ARDP)
From page 63...
... . According to the IAEA ARIS (Advanced Reactors Information System)
From page 64...
... . 3.2.3.4 Lead-Cooled Fast Reactor Lead-cooled fast reactors (LFRs)
From page 65...
... or dissolved in the molten salt to form a liquid "fuel salt" such as in Flibe Energy's design. The latter has the advantage that no solid fuel fabrication is required, but because gaseous fission products separate from the liquid fuel during operations, a fully open fuel cycle is not technically possible.13 Molten salt coolants can be either a fluoride- (e.g., FLiBe [27LiF-BeF2]
From page 66...
... Research needs for FHR fuel cycles are analogous to those described above for both TRISO fuel and molten salts, and are detailed in Chapters 4 and 5. Kairos Power is developing an example of this reactor type, the KP-FHR.
From page 67...
... use of uranium dioxide fuel with enrichment less than 5 percent uranium-235, which can be produced with the existing LWR fuel cycle infrastructure; (3) substantial financial support from government and investors; and (4)
From page 68...
... . 3.2.4 Fuel Cycle Options for Advanced Reactors During the information-gathering meetings, almost all developers told the committee that they are planning on an open, once-through fuel cycle at least for the near to intermediate terms, and likely for the next 30 years (see Table 3.1)
From page 69...
... Fully implementing a fuel cycle, however, could require a couple of decades to a century in order to transition from a fleet using one fuel cycle, such as the once-through LWR cycle, to a fleet of fast reactors using multirecycling (Williamson and Taiwo, 2021)
From page 70...
... Comparing all values for η suggests that the most promising breeding occurs with a fast reactor and 239Pu (i.e., a U-based fuel cycle)
From page 71...
... and summarized here. If the fuel is reprocessed from a thermal reactor operating on a Th/U fuel cycle, mining of U for 235U can be eliminated, thus extending nuclear fuel resources by two orders of magnitude without the need to deploy fast reactors.
From page 72...
... . However, the development, licensing, and construction of advanced reactor systems that might realize the full benefit of a closed Th/U fuel cycle is a long-term undertaking, as the requisite dedicated Gen IV and beyond breeder reactors, including molten salt reactors, are currently in the conceptual design phase.
From page 73...
... A report by the Nuclear Energy Agency of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development on Th fuel cycles highlights several long-lived radionuclides generated in Th fuel cycles -- 233U, 231Pa, and 232U -- that "have a more important radiotoxicity than their counterparts in the uranium cycle," and also concludes that "radiotoxicity of thorium-based fuels is more accurately described as being comparable to that of uranium-based spent nuclear fuel" (NEA-OECD, 2015b)
From page 74...
... 3.3 U.S. GOVERNMENT SUPPORT FOR DEVELOPMENT OF ADVANCED REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED FUEL CYCLES Chapter 2 provides information on U.S.
From page 75...
... • By 2035, demonstrate at least two additional advanced reactor designs through partnerships with industry." For developing advanced nuclear fuel cycles, the goal is to attain these objectives: • "Address gaps in the domestic nuclear fuel supply chain. • Address gaps in the domestic nuclear fuel cycle for advanced reactors.
From page 76...
... In October 2020, DOE-NE announced the selection of TerraPower and X-energy as the Advanced Reactor Demonstration award winners for demonstration of the Natrium and Xe-100 reactor designs, respectively. On December 16, 2020, DOE announced the selections of five teams to receive funding under the Risk Reduction for Future Demonstration program: Kairos Power, LLC, for the Hermes Reduced-Scale Test Reactor; Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC, for the eVinci microreactor; BWXT Advanced Technologies, LLC, for the BWXT Advanced Nuclear Reactor; Holtec Government Services, LLC, for the Holtec SMR-160 Reactor; and Southern Company Services, Inc., for the Molten Chloride Reactor Experiment.
From page 77...
... program provides "access to technical, regulatory, and financial support" for nuclear energy developers, both existing commercial reactor technologies and advanced reactors (Caponiti, 2020b)
From page 78...
... 3.3.4 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Regulatory Programs on Advanced Reactors and Associated Fuel Cycles As mentioned above, NEIMA directs the U.S.
From page 79...
... NRC staff on the regulatory programs relevant for advanced reactors and associated fuel cycles (Regan et al., 2020)
From page 80...
... Notably, advanced reactors, which propose using a wider variety of coolants and fuel types, will have more comprehensive prototyping requirements. In addition to the prototyping described above, advanced reactor developers will have to do substantial prototyping of basic materials' strength and performance when subjected to entirely different operating environments, including differing coolants, neutron flux, temperature, and pressures.
From page 81...
... This weakening in active test reactors, new build expertise, and manufacturing at a commercial level will impact how quickly technology development for advanced reactors and fuel cycles can advance in the United States, especially without considering foreign supply chain expertise. As mentioned in Section 3.3.2, a major question for development and deployment of test reactors is, Who should pay for the reactors?
From page 82...
... . While the ATR has capabilities relevant for testing some types of advanced reactors, the major missing capability is fast neutrons.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.