Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:


Pages 226-240

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 226...
... 226 8 STATIC LOAD TEST ON TL-5 BARRIER-MOMENT SLAB SYSTEM Upon completion of the full-scale TL-5 crash test, a static load test was conducted on a section of the BMS system (section B5-B6) on top of the MSE wall test installation.
From page 227...
... 227 Table 8-1. The analytical solution shows that the sliding and overturning resistance of the system are similar in magnitude when the soil resistance is considered.
From page 228...
... 228 Table 8-1 Results of the analytical solution of the TL-5 test BMS system Test Level W (kips) Moment Arms around Rotation Point B Sliding Analyses Overturning Analyses Rotation Point B TL-5-1 128.6 lB (in)
From page 229...
... 229 a) Longitudinal distribution of the quasi-static load b)
From page 230...
... 230 Figure 8-2 Results of the quasi-static FE analyses in the test barrier-foundation system. 8.3 Full-Scale Static Load Test The purpose of the static load test was to verify the magnitude of the static load applied to the barrier required to initiate movement of the BMS system.
From page 231...
... 231 Figure 8-3 Details of the full-scale static test set-up on the barrier-foundation system. 45° 1' Clean sand material Road base material Existing Deck 2'-10" Steel rod (Ø 1.75")
From page 232...
... 232 Figure 8-3 Details of the full-scale static test set-up on the barrier-foundation system (Continued)
From page 233...
... 233 a) Side view of the static test set-up b)
From page 234...
... 234 Figure 8-5 Crack in the soil during the static load test The steps of the static test were as follows: a) The system was loaded up to 100 kips (445 kN)
From page 235...
... 235 a) Load and re-load displacement curve b)
From page 236...
... 236 load reaches a magnitude of 75 kips (333.8 kN) , which is associated with the static capacity of the system to overturning discounting the shear resistance of the soil.
From page 237...
... 237 Figure 8-8 Time history load of the strip during the static test. Figure 8-9 Sketch of movement of the barrier system during the static test.
From page 238...
... 238 Figure 8-10 Relative movement at the bottom of barrier segment 6 and 7 during the during the static test. Upon completion of the static test, a visual inspection of the underlying MSE wall was conducted.
From page 239...
... 239 Figure 8-11 Relative panel movement observed during the static load test. 8.4 Comparison of Test and Simulation Figure 8-12 shows the load test results compared to the numerical simulation.
From page 240...
... 240 of the cohesion intercept estimated from the triaxial test. As explained previously, the friction component might not be attributable entirely to the soil.

Key Terms



This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.