Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:


Pages 37-42

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 37...
... 2015. "Design for Values in Nuclear Technology." In ­Handbook of Ethics, Values, and Technological Design, J
From page 38...
... The speakers were David Victor, University of California, San Diego; John Downer, University of Bristol; and Sarah Mills, University of Michigan. LESSONS FROM NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING David Victor, University of California, San Diego Victor shared lessons from his experience as chair of the volunteer community engagement panel that Southern California Edison set up for the decommissioning process for its San Onofre nuclear power plant.
From page 39...
... When a contractor irresponsibly handled a canister of spent fuel, the mistake set important community relationships back several steps, and repairing it required a total overhaul of communication strategies and an increased emphasis on operational excellence. A final lesson is the importance of strong engagement between plant operators, engagement panels, and Nuclear Regulatory ­Commission (NRC)
From page 40...
... This makes analogies between reactors and jetliners highly misleading. ­Making reactors as reliable as jetliners would require the nuclear industry to commit to a common reactor paradigm and a recursive learning pro cess, and to build and operate tens of thousands of identical reactors for decades (learning the lessons of hundreds of disasters)
From page 41...
... Mills noted that nuclear energy has certain advantages over renewables. For example, it requires less land and can be sited where power plants already exist, without significantly changing the overall landscape.
From page 42...
... Community engagement processes face a wide variety of different concerns throughout the lifespan of a project. Mills said the data suggests that procedural justice is more important than distributive justice in predicting a project's success or failure, although project acceptance can still be highly idiosyncratic by location.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.