Skip to main content

Evaluating the Process to Develop the Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2020-2025 Final Report (2023) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:

3 Methodological Approach to the Task
Pages 57-62

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 57...
... and the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (the National Academies) developed specific study questions associated with each of the three sub-tasks of the overall task (e.g., Box 3-1, "Question for Task 3")
Read the entire page →
From page 58...
... The committee interpreted Task 3 as a request to analyze how the 2020–2025 DGA would have differed in terms of timeline, cost, and integrity if they had been developed as part of a process that fully implemented the seven recommendations from the 2017 National Academies report (NASEM, 2017)
Read the entire page →
From page 59...
... In contrast, in Task 3, the outcome was the potential implications of full implementation of the 2017 National Academies report recommendations on the 2020–2025 DGA. For Task 3, the committee considered actions identified in Task 1 as well as additional relevant actions taken by the agencies to develop the DGA.
Read the entire page →
From page 60...
... The midcourse report (NASEM, 2022a) addressed Task 2, which was a comparative analysis focusing on the systematic reviews used in the process to develop the 2020–2025 DGA.
Read the entire page →
From page 61...
... 2022. An analysis of the recent US dietary guidelines process in light of its federal mandate and a National Academies report.
Read the entire page →

Key Terms

  • academies report
  • midcourse report
  • accessed september
  • dgac scientific
  • guidelines advisory

  • scientific report
  • committee interpreted
  • overall task
  • seven recommendations
  • considered actions

  • report recommendations
  • committee lacked
  • committee scientific
  • committee viewed
  • addressed task

  • committee drew
  • reflect additional
  • ascertain actions
  • previous editions
  • nical expert

  • viewed rigor
  • additional time
  • appropriations act
  • committee evaluating
  • committee responded

  • using information
  • committee noted
  • specific study
  • approaches adopted
  • dga process


    • This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
    More information on Chapter Skim is available.