Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

Building Trust in Public Health Emergency Preparedness and Response (PHEPR) Science: Proceedings of a Workshop - in Brief
Pages 1-12

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 1...
... Quinn, professor and discussions to communication and strategies to address chair at the University of Maryland School of Public misinformation and ensure clear understanding of Health, emphasized that "having trust in the science public health communications. The final session allowed that underlies how we respond to an event is key to workshop participants and public attendees -- through an an effective response." However, Brian Castrucci, interactive Miro board session -- to reflect on workshop president and chief executive officer of the De Beaumont discussions and share strategies to build public trust, Foundation, shared that the lack of public trust in what they can do in the next year, and what they can do PHEPR science still remains a barrier to action.
From page 2...
... Exploring Historical Roots of Trust and Mistrust Marian Moser Jones, associate professor at the College In addition to defining and measuring trust, the public of Public Health and the History Department at The Ohio must have a clear definition of what public health is to State University, discussed historical roots of trust and engender trust in public health science, Castrucci said. mistrust in science during public health emergencies, Alonzo Plough, vice president of research evaluationsaying that the type of emergency can often influence the learning and chief science officer at the Robert Wood public's trust towards public health efforts.
From page 3...
... four factors operating simultaneously: misinformation, politicization, economic inconvenience, and inconsistent The state of the current information ecosystem has messaging from the public health science community. fueled misinformation and mistrust by creating confusion on who the public should trust, explained Mistrust Briony Swire-Thompson, senior research scientist of the Laura Bogart, senior behavioral scientist at the Network Science Institute at Northeastern University.
From page 4...
... Louis, and Michelle However, Funk cautioned against overgeneralizing these Andrasik, director of Social & Behavioral Sciences and patterns and emphasized that there is no group that is Community Engagement at the COVID-19 Prevention monolithic in their views, and that views can fluctuate. Network, both agreed that a source of confusion and threat to trust in science in emergency situations like Marcus Plescia, chief medical officer at the Association the COVID-19 pandemic has been changing public health of State and Territorial Health Officials, also stated that messaging.
From page 5...
... Hispanic communities have reported POTENTIAL STRATEGIES FOR (RE) BUILDING AND MAINTAINING avoiding vaccination owing to fears around deportation PUBLIC TRUST IN PHEPR SCIENCE and inquiry into immigration status even though health To combat the loss of trust and misinformation related agencies should not be asking for that information, to public health, panelists discussed strategies to rebuild said Emily Brunson, associate professor at Texas State and maintain public trust in PHEPR science.
From page 6...
... Sustainable Community Engagement and Decision Making Engaging Community Health Workers Cultivating relationships as an investment in relational infrastructure with community stakeholders must be an Emphasizing the concept of community engagement, ongoing, intentional process and not something initiated panelists discussed the importance of collaborating at the time of an emergency declaration, explained with trusted community leaders and community health García and Matias Valenzuela, director of the Office of workers (CHWs) as messengers of PHEPR science and Equity and Community Partnership of Seattle and King efforts.
From page 7...
... based organizations to create social service support that largely used CHWs in COVID-19 prevention and response efforts. Rebuilding Trust Panelists also discussed strategies for regaining trust Improving Translation and Communication of PHEPR Science lost amongst communities in the United States.
From page 8...
... changing, stated Andrasik. Addressing the Information Environment Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication The current environment for communication of Crisis communication plans should clarify roles and PHEPR science information has been heavily affected responsibilities when disaster occurs and include by politics, pandemic fatigue, messaging fatigue, and guidance on how to communicate messages, what misinformation, said Bezbaruah.
From page 9...
... Efforts should be made to create collaborative tools for civil society organizations Anderson and Chandra emphasized that continual and community leaders to communicate public health engagement with community-based organizations information using local dialects, which is not always (CBOs) , CHWs, and community members should be as comfortable with governmental public health, said integrated as a core principle in public health efforts Chandra, Bezbaruah, and Henderson.
From page 10...
... 4-year digital modernization initiative to strengthen Many local agencies rely on funding sources that are digital health communication for both emergencies episodic. To build trustworthy community relationships, and nonemergencies.
From page 11...
... 7. Prioritize capacity building efforts within public health departments and provide resources and training to do predisaster work (Plough, Proctor)
From page 12...
... KIGER, Harris County Public Health; of a workshop -- in brief. Washington, DC: The National Academies RACHAEL PILTCH-LOEB, Harvard T.H.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.