Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:


Pages 85-96

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 85...
... The committee reviewed the list of 126 Commercial Aviation Safety Team (CAST) Safety Enhancements (SEs)
From page 86...
... 86 EMERGING HAZARDS IN COMMERCIAL AVIATION -- REPORT 1 System alerts. In 2013, numerous CAST SEs addressed LOC accidents and 2014 brought focus to runway excursions.
From page 87...
... APPENDIX A 87 described below we use the date of the implementation plan unless specific target dates for implementation are provided within them. Figure A-2 shows that, overall, of the 126 SEs, nine (7%)
From page 88...
... 88 EMERGING HAZARDS IN COMMERCIAL AVIATION -- REPORT 1 reports. Although CAST is a North American, largely U.S., enterprise, the International Civil Aviation Organization has issued similar guidance on many of the CAST SEs.
From page 89...
... APPENDIX A 89 will be undertaken by the Aircraft Accident Investigation Board (AAIB)
From page 90...
... 90 EMERGING HAZARDS IN COMMERCIAL AVIATION -- REPORT 1 bank angle. The first officer (FO)
From page 91...
... APPENDIX A 91 The go around followed a poorly flown instrument approach. There were no malfunctions with the aircraft (although one investigator disagreed with this, there was no physical evidence)
From page 92...
... 92 EMERGING HAZARDS IN COMMERCIAL AVIATION -- REPORT 1 The Crew's CRM was limited during approach, further weakened at go around. The accident resulted from: • The lack of a common action plan during the approach and a final approach continued below the Minimum Descent Altitude, without ground reference acquired • The inappropriate application of flight control inputs during a go around and on the activation of Terrain Avoidance and Warning System (TAWS)
From page 93...
... APPENDIX A 93 as soon as he attempted to intervene on the controls enabled the FO to continue to force the airplane into a steepening dive. UPS 1354, A300F 8-14-13, CFIT on a non-precision approach.
From page 94...
... 94 EMERGING HAZARDS IN COMMERCIAL AVIATION -- REPORT 1 the low-speed cue was visible would have likely reduced opportunities for her timely recognition of the impending event; the failure of both pilots to detect this situation was the result of a significant breakdown in their monitoring responsibilities and workload management. The flight crewmembers' performance during the flight, including the captain's deviations from standard operating procedures and the FO's failure to challenge these deviations, was not consistent with the crew resource management (CRM)
From page 95...
... APPENDIX A 95 to cope with maneuvering changes commonly experienced at major airports and would allow them to be more proficient in establishing stabilized approaches under demanding conditions; in this accident, the pilot flying may have better used pitch trim, recognized that the airspeed was decaying, and taken the appropriate corrective action of adding power.

Key Terms



This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.