Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:


Pages 32-39

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 32...
... 32 Funding Transfer from FHWA to FTA This chapter focuses on fund transfers from FHWA to FTA. Forty-seven states transferred funds to FTA during the study period.
From page 33...
... Funding Transfer from FHWA to FTA 33   $0.0 $0.2 $0.4 $0.6 $0.8 $1.0 $1.2 $1.4 $1.6 $1.8 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Bi lli on s 0.00% 0.50% 1.00% 1.50% 2.00% 2.50% 3.00% 3.50% 4.00% 4.50% $ $200,000,000 $400,000,000 $600,000,000 $800,000,000 $1,000,000,000 $1,200,000,000 $1,400,000,000 $1,600,000,000 $1,800,000,000 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Amount Transferred Percentage Figure 5-1. Annual flexible funding transfers among highway program categories from FFY2013 to FFY2020.
From page 34...
... 34 Federal Funding Flexibility: Use of Federal-Aid Highway Fund Transfers by State DOTs $0 $2 $4 $6 $8 NATIONAL HIGHWAY PERFORMANCE PROGRAM SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BLOCK GRANT HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CONGESTION MITIGATION AND AIR QUALITY NATIONAL HIGHWAY FREIGHT PROGRAM TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES Billions Federal-Aid Highway Program Category Amount Transferred Percentage of FAHP Apportionment National Highway Performance Program $225,750,199 0.13% Surface Transportation Block Grant $3,496,139,895 4.26% Highway Safety Improvement Program $7,632,381 0.04% Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality $6,259,206,699 33.98% National Highway Freight Program $0 0.00% Transportation Alternatives $108,140,712 1.80% All Categories $10,096,869,886 3.33% 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 18% N EW JE RS EY CA LI FO RN IA M AR YL AN D O RE G O N VE RM O N T N EW Y O RK AR IZ O N A W AS H IN G TO N N EV AD A M IN N ES O TA VI RG IN IA O HI O HA W AI I RH O DE IS LA N D M AS SA CH U SE TT S IL LI N O IS PE N N SY LV AN IA N EW H AM PS H IR E CO N N EC TI CU T IO W A CO LO RA DO TE XA S M IC HI G AN G EO RG IA FL O RI DA U TA H N EW M EX IC O TE N N ES SE E KA N SA S N O RT H C AR O LI N A W IS CO N SI N M AI N E M IS SO U RI IN DI AN A AL AS KA LO U IS IA N A KE N TU CK Y ID AH O AR KA N SA S AL AB AM A W YO M IN G N EB RA SK A N O RT H D AK O TA SO U TH C AR O LI N A W ES T VI RG IN IA M O N TA N A DE LA W AR E O KL AH O M A DI ST R I CT O F CO LU M BI A M IS SI SS IP PI SO U TH D AK O TA Figure 5-3. Funds transferred from highway programs to transit as a percentage of total FHWA funding apportioned, FFY2013–FFY2020.
From page 35...
... Funding Transfer from FHWA to FTA 35   Figure 5-5. Funds transferred from CMAQ to FTA as a percentage of CMAQ apportionment from FFY2013 to FFY2020.
From page 36...
... 36 Federal Funding Flexibility: Use of Federal-Aid Highway Fund Transfers by State DOTs 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% W AS H IN G TO N HA W AI I CA LI FO RN IA M AR YL AN D N EB RA SK A N EW M EX IC O U TA H G EO RG IA TE XA S N EW JE RS EY N EW Y O RK KA N SA S O RE G O N LO U IS IA N A O HI O M IC HI G AN TE N N ES SE E PE N N SY LV AN IA AR KA N SA S VI RG IN IA IN DI AN A IO W A M AS SA CH U SE TT S CO LO RA DO KE N TU CK Y ID AH O O KL AH O M A AL AB AM A AL AS KA AR IZ O N A CO N N EC TI CU T DE LA W AR E DI ST RI CT O F CO LU M BI A FL O RI DA IL LI N O IS M AI N E M IN N ES O TA M IS SI SS IP PI M IS SO U RI M O N TA N A N EV AD A N EW H AM PS H IR E N O RT H C AR O LI N A N O RT H D AK O TA RH O DE IS LA N D SO U TH C AR O LI N A SO U TH D AK O TA VE RM O N T W ES T VI RG IN IA W IS CO N SI N W YO M IN G Figure 5-7. Funds transferred from TA to FTA as a percentage of TA apportionment from FFY2013 to FFY2020.
From page 37...
... Funding Transfer from FHWA to FTA 37   0.0% 0.2% 0.4% 0.6% 0.8% 1.0% 1.2% 1.4% 1.6% VI RG IN IA U TA H N EW Y O RK AL AB AM A AL AS KA AR IZ O N A AR KA N SA S CA LI FO RN IA CO LO RA DO CO N N EC TI CU T DE LA W AR E DI ST RI CT O F CO LU M BI A FL O RI DA G EO RG IA HA W AI I ID AH O IL LI N O IS IN DI AN A IO W A KA N SA S KE N TU CK Y LO U IS IA N A M AI N E M AR YL AN D M AS SA CH U SE TT S M IC HI G AN M IN N ES O TA M IS SI SS IP PI M IS SO U RI M O N TA N A N EB RA SK A N EV AD A N EW H AM PS H IR E N EW JE RS EY N EW M EX IC O N O RT H C AR O LI N A N O RT H D AK O TA O HI O O KL AH O M A O RE G O N PE N N SY LV AN IA RH O DE IS LA N D SO U TH C AR O LI N A SO U TH D AK O TA TE N N ES SE E TE XA S VE RM O N T W AS H IN G TO N W ES T VI RG IN IA W IS CO N SI N W YO M IN G Figure 5-9. Funds transferred from HSIP to FTA as a percentage of HSIP apportionment from FFY2013 to FFY2020.
From page 38...
... 38 Federal Funding Flexibility: Use of Federal-Aid Highway Fund Transfers by State DOTs 5.2 Considerations That Drive Decisions of Funding Transfer from FHWA to FTA There are a number of considerations that state DOTs made when deciding to transfer funds from FAHP programs to FTA. 5.2.1 State and Regional Priorities MPOs were often influential in getting a state DOT to transfer funds to transit and other priorities within their respective regions.
From page 39...
... Funding Transfer from FHWA to FTA 39   5.2.4 No 50 Percent Limit on Transfers The decision to transfer funds to FTA is not subject to the 50 percent limit that applies to transfers among FAHP programs. Some states have transferred more than 50 percent of their apportionments from certain FAHP categories.

Key Terms



This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.