The National Academies Press

Currently Skimming:

Summary
Pages 1-5

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.

From page 1... ... While incidents affecting academic freedom, freedom of expression, and shared governance did take place, the most egregious of these happened at CIs outside of the United States. Sustained interest by Congress and political pressure led numerous 1 The committee wants to state upfront that when referring to China, this report is referring to the People's Republic of China, the State, which is controlled by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Read the entire page →
From page 2... ... This report addresses the first charge and presents a set of findings and recommendations focused on waiver criteria that DOD can use to delineate a clear and transparent waiver process in advance of FY 2024. The committee's recommendations, developed after receiving input from a variety of key individuals and organizations during open committee meetings, are as follows: Recommendation 1.1: Granting Waivers In the absence of any applicable adverse information that cannot be addressed or mitigated through the criteria below or other means, DOD should grant a waiver if an applying institution of higher education meets the stated waiver criteria. Read the entire page →
From page 3... ... U.S. host institutions should demonstrate that the CI is a formally estab lished Center or Institute at the institution, thereby subjecting the CI to all policies and procedures prescribed in faculty, staff, and student codes, as well as in shared governance documents that ensure that similar units within the university support the key values of American academic institutions, including academic freedom and openness and respectful behavior toward other host institution academic units. Read the entire page →
From page 4... ... Institutions can satisfy this criterion by providing documentation, such as an employment contract or agreement, that the director of the CI is employed by the university with a reporting line to the host institution's chief academic officer or their designee, and by providing public-facing personnel rosters that clearly state whether the host institution clas sifies CI-affiliated personnel from the Chinese partner institution as either host institution employees or as visiting scholars. CIs should hire their employees and affiliates in accordance with the host in stitution's human resources policies and procedures and subject to corresponding campus policies. Read the entire page →
From page 5... ... The committee will present additional findings and recommendations in a second report to be released in June 2023. 2 "Hanban" is the colloquial term for the Chinese International Education Foundation, or CIEF, now known as the Ministry of Education Center for Language Education and Cooperation, or CLEC. Read the entire page →

From page 1...

... While incidents affecting academic freedom, freedom of expression, and shared governance did take place, the most egregious of these happened at CIs outside of the United States. Sustained interest by Congress and political pressure led numerous 1 The committee wants to state upfront that when referring to China, this report is referring to the People's Republic of China, the State, which is controlled by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)

Read the entire page →

From page 2...

... This report addresses the first charge and presents a set of findings and recommendations focused on waiver criteria that DOD can use to delineate a clear and transparent waiver process in advance of FY 2024. The committee's recommendations, developed after receiving input from a variety of key individuals and organizations during open committee meetings, are as follows: Recommendation 1.1: Granting Waivers In the absence of any applicable adverse information that cannot be addressed or mitigated through the criteria below or other means, DOD should grant a waiver if an applying institution of higher education meets the stated waiver criteria.

Read the entire page →

From page 3...

... U.S. host institutions should demonstrate that the CI is a formally estab lished Center or Institute at the institution, thereby subjecting the CI to all policies and procedures prescribed in faculty, staff, and student codes, as well as in shared governance documents that ensure that similar units within the university support the key values of American academic institutions, including academic freedom and openness and respectful behavior toward other host institution academic units.

Read the entire page →

From page 4...

... Institutions can satisfy this criterion by providing documentation, such as an employment contract or agreement, that the director of the CI is employed by the university with a reporting line to the host institution's chief academic officer or their designee, and by providing public-facing personnel rosters that clearly state whether the host institution clas sifies CI-affiliated personnel from the Chinese partner institution as either host institution employees or as visiting scholars. CIs should hire their employees and affiliates in accordance with the host in stitution's human resources policies and procedures and subject to corresponding campus policies.

Read the entire page →

From page 5...

... The committee will present additional findings and recommendations in a second report to be released in June 2023. 2 "Hanban" is the colloquial term for the Chinese International Education Foundation, or CIEF, now known as the Ministry of Education Center for Language Education and Cooperation, or CLEC.

Read the entire page →

Next Chapter Skim →

This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.

Summary Pages 1-5

Summary
Pages 1-5