Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

2 Characteristics and Features of Confucius Institutes
Pages 16-23

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 16...
... The committee, through the information gathering conducted in support of this report, finds it is possible to implement measures on campus to mitigate -- but not to fully eliminate -- the risks associated with the presence of a CI and protect academic freedom, freedom of expression and dissent, and national security. Therefore, the committee developed waiver criteria it believes will protect U.S.
From page 17...
... for Fiscal Year (FY) 2021, which called for the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine to conduct this consensus study, defines the term "Confucius Institute" as a "cultural institute directly or indirectly funded by the Government of the People's Republic of China."1 Later legislation expanded the definition of CI to a "cultural institute established as a partnership between a United States institution of higher education and a Chinese institution of higher education to promote and teach Chinese language and culture that is funded, directly or indirectly, by the Government of the People's Republic of China."2 1 William M
From page 18...
... .3 The committee does not intend for this definition to capture Chinese language and culture partnerships funded through other nongovernmental funding channels, scientific and technological research partnerships and collaborations, or the Chinese Students and Scholars Association organization. CURRENT LANDSCAPE The committee identified 10 open CIs and 7 closing or paused CIs in the United States in March 2022 and is aware of 7 open CIs4 in the United States as of December 2022.5 Of the 7 open CIs, only 3 submitted data to the National Science Foundation's Higher Education Research and Development Survey (HERD)
From page 19...
... . While not all of these institutions shared the reasoning behind their CI closures, Bryant University President Ross Gittell stated in a 2021 letter to the community that the CI closure was the result of "changes that are taking place in China and regarding U.S.-China relations…" (Bryant University, 2021; NBC 10, 2021)
From page 20...
... . The publicly stated reasons for closure collected by the National Association of Scholars were analyzed by National Academies staff (Appendix D)
From page 21...
... . CIs in some of these nations, including Australia, Austria, Canada, France, Germany, Israel, and the UK, are encountering similar issues as those in the United States as their respective relationships with China deteriorate and as they further contemplate the academic freedom and national 11 See https://www.plu.edu/confucius-institute/agreements/.
From page 22...
... . This comes immediately after the September 2022 report released by the Henry Jackson Society, a trans-Atlantic, UK-based think tank, which presents the following series of recommendations regarding CIs in the UK: • The UK government should introduce legislation to remove CIs from UK universities; • There must be an immediate investigation regarding the legality of CIs' staff recruitment practices; • The UK government should add an amendment to the Higher Educa tion (Freedom of Speech)
From page 23...
... • The structure, operations, and management of CIs in the United States varies from institution to institution.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.