Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

6 The Gatekeepers of STEMM: How Individual Bias and Inequality Persist and How STEMM Professionals Can Help
Pages 154-190

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 154...
... However, Chapters 5 and 6 are meant to be read and understood together as they are not mutually exclusive phenomena, but rather two sides of the same coin. Like the previous chapter, the current chapter addresses the charge in the statement of task on reviewing the research and evidence on the ways in which racism at the individual level impedes STEMM careers for minoritized individuals.
From page 155...
... , hardly conducive to STEMM recruitment. White individuals tend to view Native Americans through varied lenses also: the noble, wise, nature-loving elder Indian stereotype versus the ignoble, disreputable alcoholic stereotype (Burkeley et al., 2017)
From page 156...
... They can directly shape minoritized individuals' ability to access, be included, and thrive in STEMM, as they define the skills, identities, and values necessary for minoritized individuals to persist (Estrada et al., 2011)
From page 157...
... White Gatekeepers in STEMM Chapter 2 covers an extensive history of how a racial hierarchy was created and reinforced in the United States to systematically advantage White individuals (structural racism) , and chapter 3 provides detailed figures on racial disparities in STEMM contexts.
From page 158...
... . While power and status are disproportionally located within this group, there is research demonstrating that many White individuals express discomfort identifying as White because of the association with White supremacy (Grzanka, Gonzalez, & Spanieman, 2019; Thomann & Suyemoto, 2018)
From page 159...
... That is, on average White individuals are prone to keeping their surroundings White (Charles, 2000)
From page 160...
... Overt racism, forged in years of slavery and oppression, inaccurately views Black individuals as inferior to White individuals, even as subhuman, dating back to pseudo-logic justifying slavery (Oh, 2020)
From page 161...
... Instead, White individuals on average view their own group as losing ground, as Black individuals gain civil rights. Conversely, research demonstrates Black individuals less often view civil rights as a zero-sum game over time (Peacock & Biernat, 2021)
From page 162...
... . Another difference is by personality; certain personalities among White individuals are predictive of tendencies toward exhibiting biases more than others.
From page 163...
... . Aversive racism is where individuals who hold and may express outwardly egalitarian attitudes nevertheless have an aversion to members of their outgroups (e.g., White individuals having an aversion to Black individuals, Indigenous individuals, Latine individuals)
From page 164...
... . Furthermore, these experiences of microaggressions act as a major barrier because they reduce minoritized individuals' sense of belonging within STEMM contexts (Miles et al., 2020; Smith et al., 2022)
From page 165...
... To counter racism in STEMM, systemic accountability at the organizational level will be essential. Automatic Category Detection and Implicit Associations The following research will show that ordinary individual racial bias is more automatic than most people think.
From page 166...
... . Decades of research using the IAT have demonstrated a substantial prevalence of implicit bias against Black individuals, such that White individuals on average associate their own group labels (White, European-American)
From page 167...
... People working in racially homogenous STEMM departments and organizations may be particularly susceptible to perpetuating racial biases, given they are not being challenged to question their existing worldviews. Increased numeric diversity may be essential to interrupting existing social cognitive processes for White individuals.
From page 168...
... 6-15 Pre-Publication Copy, Uncorrected Proofs
From page 169...
... . Ambivalent, Plausibly Deniable Biases Research shows that ordinary individual racial bias is more ambivalent than most people think.
From page 170...
... . If these results characterize STEMM interactions, it is possible that White individuals are unintentionally patronizing their Black colleagues, while feeling friendly in the attempt.
From page 171...
... . When White gatekeepers opt to choose others similar to self, they are not necessarily displaying hostility to minoritized individuals, but perhaps comfort with other ingroup White individuals.
From page 172...
... Comprehending these motives can suggest how to intervene in systemic structures that routinely advantage White individuals. Belonging works as 6-19 Pre-Publication Copy, Uncorrected Proofs
From page 173...
... reasons for policy, including policy pertaining to advancing diversity. Institutional justifications for antiracism, diversity, equity and inclusion, if they focus on profit or benefits to White individuals, are generally pleasing to White respondents (Starck et al., 2021)
From page 174...
... . One study found that White individuals who were strong endorsers of social dominance orientation, as compared to those White individuals who were not, were more likely to categorize a multiracial (Black-White)
From page 175...
... . Individual differences in social dominance orientation therefore predicts which STEMM gatekeepers will be open to leveling the playing field and which will favor hierarchies.
From page 176...
... Gatekeepers can exploit this, because justifying the system entails endorsing positive stereotypes about their own group. Indeed, system justification works better for White individuals than for Black individuals (Rankin et al., 2009)
From page 177...
... Taking these perceptions together, White individuals and minoritized individuals during interracial interactions may have different impression management goals stemming from their meta-perceptions (Fiske et al., 2015)
From page 178...
... . Consistent with these ideas, White individuals scoring higher on a White "fragility" scale also endorsed modern racism, social inequalities, and allegedly colorblind racial attitudes (Langrehr et al., 2021)
From page 179...
... . Specifically, the population of minoritized individuals has been growing faster than White individuals, and minoritized individuals could attain majority-minority status by 2050 (Richeson & Sommers, 2016)
From page 180...
... These factors contribute to advantage gatekeepers and disadvantage minoritized individuals, their position challenges the gatekeepers' proclivity to notice, let alone remedy racism in STEMM. Furthermore, additional research demonstrated demographic shifts occurring in the United States, specifically perceptions of the "majority-minority" shift, may be perceived as a potential threat to the preservation of the status quo, and a source of anxiety around this possible loss in power and status.
From page 181...
... 6-28 Pre-Publication Copy, Uncorrected Proofs
From page 182...
... . White and minority demographic shifts, intergroup threat, and right wing extremism.
From page 183...
... . Bias in the air: A nationwide exploration of teachers' implicit racial attitudes, aggregate bias, and student outcomes.
From page 184...
... . Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test.
From page 185...
... . A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo.
From page 186...
... Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 99, 104266. Kruglanski, A
From page 187...
... Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(3)
From page 188...
... . Racial disparities in school-based disciplinary actions are associated with county-level rates of racial bias.
From page 189...
... Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 64, 27 34. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J
From page 190...
... . Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and prejudice.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.