Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:


Pages 179-206

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 179...
... E-1   A P P E N D I X E Driving Simulator Study Details METHODOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS In driving simulator studies, the line between using comprehension and compliance as a measure of effectiveness is a fine one. Drivers can demonstrate their comprehension of a device by heeding its direction or advice through some driving behavior such as speed modification or lane changes.
From page 180...
... E-2 Application of Dynamic Lane-Use Control: Proposed Practices 13. How do drivers interpret the various resting modes (e.g., blank, green arrow, or other)
From page 181...
... Driving Simulator Study Details E-3   Table E-1. Experimental design for simulator study.
From page 182...
... E-4 Application of Dynamic Lane-Use Control: Proposed Practices Table E-2. Run order of the versions in the two "drives." Run Order DRIVE_A N=15 DRIVE_B N=15 1 A A 2 G I 3 C C 4 M M 5 B D 6 E E 7 A Plus M Plus 8 F F 9 H J 10 K L Table E-3 shows the planned comparisons for the different versions of the simulator drive developed to answer the research questions of interest.
From page 183...
... Driving Simulator Study Details E-5   1 2 3 4 1 mi 0 mi, key sign location -1 mi -2 mi 1 mi 0 mi, key sign location -1 mi -2 mi Version A • 1-mile spacing, 4 miles total length. • Overhead with downward diagonal yellow arrow.
From page 184...
... E-6 Application of Dynamic Lane-Use Control: Proposed Practices Version B • 0.5-mi spacing, 4 miles total length. • Mix overhead and shoulder with downward diagonal yellow arrow.
From page 185...
... Driving Simulator Study Details E-7   Version C • 0.5-mi spacing, 4 miles total length. • Overhead with downward diagonal yellow arrow transition.
From page 186...
... E-8 Application of Dynamic Lane-Use Control: Proposed Practices 0 mi, key sign location 0 mi, key sign location 0 mi, key sign location Version K • 0.5-mile spacing, 1-mile total length. • Overhead with all green downward arrows.
From page 187...
... Driving Simulator Study Details E-9   0 mi, key sign location Version G • 0.5-mile spacing, 2 miles total length. • Overhead with yellow X
From page 188...
... E-10 Application of Dynamic Lane-Use Control: Proposed Practices 0 mi, key sign location Version I • 0.5-mile spacing, 2 miles total length. • Overhead with downward diagonal yellow arrow.
From page 189...
... Driving Simulator Study Details E-11   0 mi, key sign location Version M • 1-mile spacing, 4 miles total length. • Overhead signs with yellow X transition.
From page 190...
... E-12 Application of Dynamic Lane-Use Control: Proposed Practices Figure E-8. TTI driving simulator from REALTIME Technologies, Inc.
From page 191...
... Driving Simulator Study Details E-13   Figure E-10. Example of diagonal downward arrow in the simulator.
From page 192...
... E-14 Application of Dynamic Lane-Use Control: Proposed Practices including time for instruction, practice, testing, and debriefing. The protocol for the study was approved by the Texas A&M Institutional Review Board.
From page 193...
... Driving Simulator Study Details E-15   Table E-4. Descriptive statistics of raw data representing the distance from the key sign when a participant changed lanes.
From page 194...
... E-16 Application of Dynamic Lane-Use Control: Proposed Practices Table E-5. Number of observations completed per version.
From page 195...
... Driving Simulator Study Details E-17   Table E-6. Descriptive statistics for participants who changed lanes within 0.5 mile of initial changed sign.
From page 196...
... E-18 Application of Dynamic Lane-Use Control: Proposed Practices Version G Version H Average 695 ft Median 912 ft Average 1,111 ft Median 1,019 ft Lane Change Distance (ft) Negative Positive Figure E-13.
From page 197...
... Driving Simulator Study Details E-19   Version I Version J Average 1,004 ft Median 1,015 ft Average 1,036 ft Median 1,021 ft Lane Change Distance (ft) Negative Positive Figure E-14.
From page 198...
... E-20 Application of Dynamic Lane-Use Control: Proposed Practices Research Questions 5 and 6: Best Symbol for Lane Closure. Does One Symbol Cause Early Merges?
From page 199...
... Driving Simulator Study Details E-21   Version A Version M Average 543 ft Median 498 ft Average 916 ft Median 910 ft Lane Change Distance (ft) Negative Positive Note that Version A was the first version every participant drove in the study.
From page 200...
... E-22 Application of Dynamic Lane-Use Control: Proposed Practices Version A Plus Version M Plus Average 1,597 ft Median 1,770 ft Average 1,094 ft Median 1,195 ft Lane Change Distance (ft) Negative Positive Figure E-16.
From page 201...
... Driving Simulator Study Details E-23   Version C Version E Average 1,367 ft Median 1,426 ft Average 1,046 ft Median 1,214 ft Lane Change Distance (ft) Negative Positive Figure E-17.
From page 202...
... E-24 Application of Dynamic Lane-Use Control: Proposed Practices Research Question 7: Time Interval for Green to Yellow to Red Transition Some agencies are considering changing from OPEN to CLOSED without any yellow symbol to serve as a clearance interval. This research question was addressed with Version F, which contained no yellow symbols.
From page 203...
... Driving Simulator Study Details E-25   Research Question 13. Resting State For Version L where all the signal displays were dark, no participants changed lanes.
From page 204...
... E-26 Application of Dynamic Lane-Use Control: Proposed Practices Figure E-20. Comparison of Versions B and C
From page 205...
... Driving Simulator Study Details E-27   Research Question 15. Longitudinal Spacing The study was designed to allow two separate comparisons to look at the effect of longitudinal spacing: Versions A versus M (Figure E-15)
From page 206...
... E-28 Application of Dynamic Lane-Use Control: Proposed Practices Lane-Change Data Summary In general, the results of the driving simulator study were not as informative as the computerbased testing, and no large differences were noted between many of the versions. This could be due to the relatively low workload of the participants and low traffic volume in adjacent lanes.

Key Terms



This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.