Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:


Pages 208-224

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 208...
... 208 A P P E N D I X E In-Service RPM Retroreflectivity Measurement Introduction RPMs become less effective for two main reasons; the devices can either be dislodged from the roadway or they lose their retroreflective ability. Both circumstances are mainly caused from vehicular and environmental wear over time.
From page 209...
... In-Service RPM Retroreflectivity Measurement 209   RPMs. Unfortunately, it is not a realistic option for evaluating a large quantity of RPMs because the device must be lifted and brought to each individual RPM that needs to be evaluated.
From page 210...
... 210 Performance Criteria for Retroreflective Pavement Markers Closed-Course Test Area The closed testing was conducted at the Texas A&M University RELLIS Campus. Sections of the facility are marked with stripes and RPMs.
From page 211...
... In-Service RPM Retroreflectivity Measurement 211   (a)
From page 212...
... 212 Performance Criteria for Retroreflective Pavement Markers RPMs at the closed-course test area, the county-maintained road test area, and the wet testing in the TTI visibility lab. Before each set of measurements, the retroreflectometer was calibrated according to the manufacturer specifications.
From page 213...
... In-Service RPM Retroreflectivity Measurement 213   values in the standard file were generally all from the pavement markings that were measured at the same time as the RPMs. Figure E-3 provides an image of the mobile retroreflectometer mounted to a vehicle.
From page 214...
... 214 Performance Criteria for Retroreflective Pavement Markers Figure E-3. Mobile retroreflectometer mounted on vehicle.
From page 215...
... In-Service RPM Retroreflectivity Measurement 215   Portable Retroreflectometer Data The portable retroreflectometer was used on three test areas of 24 RPMs at the closedcourse test area. The retroreflectivity values at the closed-course test area ranged from 19 mcd/lux to 570 mcd/lux.
From page 216...
... 216 Performance Criteria for Retroreflective Pavement Markers RPM, hits less than 1,000 mcd/m2/lux would be ignored because the laser more than likely only hit a portion of the RPM. The rest of the multiple hits then had their RL values averaged.
From page 217...
... In-Service RPM Retroreflectivity Measurement 217   mW, the results were much different. Only two trials at 70 mph were done because speed was found to not impact the detection capabilities.
From page 218...
... 218 Performance Criteria for Retroreflective Pavement Markers (a)
From page 219...
... In-Service RPM Retroreflectivity Measurement 219   (a)
From page 220...
... 220 Performance Criteria for Retroreflective Pavement Markers (a)
From page 221...
... In-Service RPM Retroreflectivity Measurement 221   Overall, it does not appear that the two devices produce values that can be used to predict one another. The mobile device does have the ability to monitor RPM presence, but the visibility information the system provides does not appear to be useful.
From page 222...
... 222 Performance Criteria for Retroreflective Pavement Markers (a)
From page 223...
... In-Service RPM Retroreflectivity Measurement 223   Findings and Recommendations The mobile retroreflectometer has the ability to record RL values for RPMs while traveling at highway speeds, while simultaneously evaluating the pavement markings on the roadway. The research found that the mobile retroreflectivity values for the RPMs do not correlate well with the portable RPM retroreflectometer.
From page 224...
... 224 Performance Criteria for Retroreflective Pavement Markers 6. Migletz, J., J

Key Terms



This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.