Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:


Pages 46-57

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 46...
... 46 APPENDIX C EVALUATION OF THE SUBGRADE STRENGTH ESTIMATION METHODOLOGY USING LTPP DATABASE This appendix presents two case studies for the methodology developed by Nabizadeh et al.
From page 47...
... 47 of this selection with a seasonal analysis. Warmer locations (Nebraska)
From page 49...
... 49 For the other selected deflection data, once the backcalculated modulus for the subgrade and for the equivalent layer above the subgrade were estimated (Table C-3 and Table C-4) , the structure was simulated in a layered linear elastic software (MnLayer)
From page 50...
... 50 Table C-4 - Backcalculated parameters and principal stresses for section South Dakota 0804 Backcalculated MnLayer Date Location FWD Load Level MR sub (psi)
From page 51...
... 51 The resulting deviator (ฯƒd) stresses at each load level are used to compute (Equation C5)
From page 52...
... 52 Table C-6 Subgrade parameters for section South Dakota 0804 Date Location FWD Load Level ๐œŽ๐œŽ๐‘‘๐‘‘ (psi)
From page 53...
... 53 (b) Figure C-2 Deviator (ฯƒd)
From page 54...
... 54 (b) Figure C-3 Linear fitting for deviator (ฯƒd)
From page 55...
... 55 Date Location ฯƒdf (psi)
From page 57...
... 57 Since the methodology is limited to deflection data indicating a softening behavior of the subgrade, the great majority of deflection data available for a particular section cannot be used to estimate subgrade parameters. This limitation is aggravated if the section is located in a cold climate region where the majority of data exhibits a hardening or linear subgrade behavior.

Key Terms



This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.