Mobility on Demand and Automated Driving Systems: A Framework for Public-Sector Assessment (2022) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:
Pages 107-113
The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.
From page 107... ...
107 REPORT APPENDIX A: STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT On April 17, 2019, at the Transportation Research Board's 2019 International Conference on Demand-Responsive and Innovative Transportation Services, the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) hosted a stakeholder engagement session.
|
From page 108... ...
108 REPORT prompted a productive conversation regarding accessibility issues, raising questions including: "Who will be able to access these vehicles? How will we ensure they are accessible to users of different wheelchairs, for example?
|
From page 109... ...
109 REPORT wheelchairs and other mobility devices, were concerned about physical implications and were cautious about assistance for getting in and out of a vehicle, for example. Another participant, though, noted that labeling groups of individuals with disabilities into those with disabilities visible and invisible could easily lead towards a "separate but equal" system.
|
From page 110... ...
110 REPORT such as battery charging, battery replacement, tire rotation, tire pressure, and other standard vehicle maintenance. The AVs may need inductive charging or to be swapped out with another for maintenance to be performed; the group noted that AVs could not run constantly.
|
From page 111... ...
111 REPORT Table 18. MOD and AV Use Cases: Various from Stakeholders Additional Use Cases Description Bus Rapid Transit If AVs are separated from human drivers and pedestrians, the vehicles can travel much faster than human drivers, and more safely.
|
From page 112... ...
112 REPORT Table 19. MOD and AV Use Cases: On-Demand Automated Shared Rides Impact Category Relevant Impact Assessment Questions Behavioral Shifts What incentives need to be in place to influence or encourage travelers to use an on-demand automated shared ride?
|
From page 113... ...
113 REPORT STAKEHOLDER ATTENDANCE Twenty-seven individuals are recorded as participating in the stakeholder engagement. The following list comprises the affiliations of stakeholder attendants: • CCTA • Goin • Liftango • MCA • MemEx • Miami-Dade Transportation Planning Organization (TPO)
|
Key Terms
This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More
information on Chapter Skim is available.