Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:


Pages 47-51

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 47...
... Finding 3: The FFRDC addressed the possibility of funding shortfalls by establishing a flat annual budget of $450 million and comparing this to the year-by-year funding requirements of SLAW treatment alternatives. Annual surpluses, if any, could be carried over for future use.
From page 48...
... Specifically, it would be helpful to focus on the significant adverse consequences of grouted SLAW not being acceptable for disposal at IDF or other out-of-state disposal sites. Finding 6: Like the regulatory approval criterion, the FFRDC treated public acceptance as an uncertainty to be considered by the decision makers.
From page 49...
... Based on the variability of Hanford tank waste compositions the committee would expect significant variability of the liquid SLAW composition in each tanker -- and the specific and total activity of the waste in the tanker. The implications of using monthly averages of pretreated liquid SLAW compositions when dose limits are on a tanker-by-tanker basis are not evident.
From page 50...
... discussing the possibility that permission to dispose of grouted SLAW at WCS and/or Clive might never occur or someday be withdrawn; (2) discussing what is known about public acceptance regarding potential grouted SLAW disposal in Texas and Utah; and (3)
From page 51...
... APPENDIX E 51 Finding 17: The FFRDC provided additional analysis of grout for consideration including a number of alternatives described in detail and an examination of SRS's experience with grouting.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.