Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:


Pages 159-190

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 159...
... D-1   A P P E N D I X D Contents D-2 Introduction and Background D-2 Objective D-2 Methodology D-2 Workshops D-4 Final Roadmap Overview D-4 Research Problem Statements Overview -- by Thematic Lane D-4 Research Problem Statements -- by Roadmap Phase Research Problem Statements
From page 160...
... D-2 Developing a Highway Framework to Conduct an All-Hazards Risk and Resilience Analysis Introduction and Background Under NCHRP Project 23-09, "Scoping Study to Develop the Basis for a Highway Standard to Conduct an All-Hazards Risk and Resilience Analysis," the research team conducted a literature review, gap assessment, and stakeholder engagement to solicit feedback in support of the roadmap to develop the Highway Risk and Resilience (R&R) Manual as follows: • Literature Review and Gap Assessment -- February 17, 2021 • Stakeholder engagements -- March and April 2021 and September 22, 2021 A research roadmap is a high-level document that guides the development of a research program by (1)
From page 161...
... Figure D-1. RPS topics and mapping exercise.
From page 162...
... D-4 Developing a Highway Framework to Conduct an All-Hazards Risk and Resilience Analysis Final Roadmap Overview A final research roadmap to develop and implement the Highway R&R Manual was developed incorporating feedback from the project panel, the TRB Committee on Transportation Asset Management (AJE30) , the AASHTO liaison for this project as well as multiple other stakeholders.
From page 164...
... D-6 Developing a Highway Framework to Conduct an All-Hazards Risk and Resilience Analysis • RPS A4. Identifying Institutional, Organizational, and Procedural (IOP)
From page 165...
... Research Problem Statements D-7 American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Special Committee on Research and Innovation FY (TBD)
From page 166...
... D-8 Developing a Highway Framework to Conduct an All-Hazards Risk and Resilience Analysis 4. RESEARCH OBJECTIVE The objective of this research is to supplement current and past efforts of NCHRP projects and state of practice among transportation agencies to develop quantitative, repeatable methodologies for conducting quantitative risk assessments for top priority threats/hazards for highway assets identified in previous work.
From page 167...
... Research Problem Statements D-9 7. RECOMMENDED RESEARCH FUNDING AND RESEARCH PERIOD The estimated total funds needed to accomplish the research objectives are roughly $1.5 M to $2 M
From page 168...
... D-10 Developing a Highway Framework to Conduct an All-Hazards Risk and Resilience Analysis American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Special Committee on Research and Innovation FY(TBD)
From page 169...
... Research Problem Statements D-11 7. RECOMMENDED RESEARCH FUNDING AND RESEARCH PERIOD The estimated total funds needed to accomplish the research objectives are roughly $200,000 to $250,000.
From page 170...
... D-12 Developing a Highway Framework to Conduct an All-Hazards Risk and Resilience Analysis American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Special Committee on Research and Innovation FY(TBD)
From page 171...
... Research Problem Statements D-13 4. RESEARCH OBJECTIVE The objective of this research is to develop quantitative resilience assessment methodologies and metrics for transportation highway assets.
From page 172...
... D-14 Developing a Highway Framework to Conduct an All-Hazards Risk and Resilience Analysis American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Special Committee on Research and Innovation FY(TBD)
From page 173...
... Research Problem Statements D-15 5. URGENCY AND POTENTIAL BENEFITS In the face of climate change, federal mandates, and the challenge of prioritizing limited resources, DOTs have repeatedly expressed a need for more tools, methodologies, and metrics for risk and resilience assessment.
From page 174...
... D-16 Developing a Highway Framework to Conduct an All-Hazards Risk and Resilience Analysis American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Special Committee on Research and Innovation FY(TBD)
From page 175...
... Research Problem Statements D-17 • Perform a qualitative assessment of identified and classified practices. • Develop strategies for communication and collaboration within multi-disciplinary agency groups as well as with other agencies to implement Highway Risk and Resilience (R&R)
From page 176...
... D-18 Developing a Highway Framework to Conduct an All-Hazards Risk and Resilience Analysis • Assess available training programs in academic or professional development forums and their alignment in providing the skills necessary for a more mature development and assessment of risk and resilience. • Provide guidance with recommendations on risk and resilience skills and development programs available, being developed, and needing to be developed to provide effective individual support in necessary skills training.
From page 177...
... Research Problem Statements D-19 5. URGENCY AND POTENTIAL BENEFITS While there are several past and active NCHRP projects that relate to risk and resilience assessment, so far, there do not appear to be any projects that have focused on the topic of capacity building for risk and resilience assessment.
From page 178...
... D-20 Developing a Highway Framework to Conduct an All-Hazards Risk and Resilience Analysis The proposed program of projects would serve to support managing the testing and validation of the Highway Risk and Resilience (R&R) Manual by DOTs.
From page 179...
... Research Problem Statements D-21 5. URGENCY AND POTENTIAL BENEFITS From the literature review, there does not seem to be any previous or ongoing research that tests the implementation of a standard for highway risk and resilience assessment.
From page 180...
... D-22 Developing a Highway Framework to Conduct an All-Hazards Risk and Resilience Analysis • Make a business case for integrating risk and resilience results into DOT practices and decision-support systems by demonstrating the needs and benefits of the proposed IOP changes. • Illustrate how agencies can assess and transition from their current legacy IOP arrangements to a risk- and-resilience-informed framework.
From page 181...
... Research Problem Statements D-23 5. URGENCY AND POTENTIAL BENEFITS From the literature review, there does not seem to be any previous or ongoing research focusing on the topic of organizational readiness for the implementation of new strategies for risk and resilience assessments.
From page 182...
... D-24 Developing a Highway Framework to Conduct an All-Hazards Risk and Resilience Analysis • Conduct multi-state DOT pilot study implementations of the training plan and materials. • Conduct an evaluation of the pilot studies.
From page 183...
... Research Problem Statements D-25 6. IMPLEMENTATION CONSIDERATIONS Factors that impact implementation include: • Existing policies and procedures • Technology • Data and data management • Agency leadership and culture • Previous experience with risk and resilience assessment methodologies and tools Factors that accelerate the use and implementation of quantitative risk and resilience assessment methodologies include risk and resilience champions with the agency and new policies promoting risk and resilience assessment.
From page 184...
... D-26 Developing a Highway Framework to Conduct an All-Hazards Risk and Resilience Analysis American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Special Committee on Research and Innovation FY(TBD)
From page 185...
... Research Problem Statements D-27 6. IMPLEMENTATION CONSIDERATIONS Successful implementation will require leadership and internal collaboration to get staff on board with making changes to existing practices and updating appropriate policies, documents, and procedures to reflect the new changes.
From page 186...
... D-28 Developing a Highway Framework to Conduct an All-Hazards Risk and Resilience Analysis • Develop tools for estimating asset/system criticality. • Develop tools for estimating threat likelihood.
From page 187...
... Research Problem Statements D-29 5. URGENCY AND POTENTIAL BENEFITS Recent scans of transportation agencies reveal the most common risk assessment tool is still the risk register.
From page 188...
... D-30 Developing a Highway Framework to Conduct an All-Hazards Risk and Resilience Analysis • Develop metrics and communication strategies for reporting the results of resilience assessments for the purposes of planning, prioritization, screening, scoping, evaluation, etc. • Develop quantitative resilience assessment tools that facilitate analysis at a point of time and as a function of time, are easy to use, and require minimal training.
From page 189...
... Research Problem Statements D-31 5. URGENCY AND POTENTIAL BENEFITS Recent scans of transportation agencies reveal that the most common risk assessment tool is still the risk register.

Key Terms



This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.