Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

Appendix E Development of Crash Modification Functions for Improving Curve Delineation
Pages 113-125

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 113...
... Appendix E Development of Crash Modification Functions for Improving Curve Delineation E-1
From page 114...
... E-5 4.1 Lane Departure Crashes ........................................................................................................... E-5 4.2 Dark Conditions Crashes ..........................................................................................................
From page 115...
... The original analysis found statistically significant reductions at the 95-percent confidence level in injury, dark condition and lane departure during dark conditions crashes using data from two States where installations were evaluated. Intersection-related crashes were not included in all crash types.
From page 116...
... Attempts to do so did not provide for reliable estimates of safety effectiveness for individual sites or for sites grouped by site characteristics. In the GLM regression approach, each site was considered as an observation.
From page 117...
... The model form for model 1 is shown below and the parameter estimates, standard errors and pvalues provided in Table 2. The estimated parameters are statistically significant and the overdispersion parameter of 0.3018 indicates a reasonable fit to the data.
From page 118...
... For curves with an AADT over approximately 3,000 the implied CMF is less than 1.0 and the CMF bottoms out at approximately 0.50. Pred LD CMF using AADT 1.80 1.60 1.40 1.20 1.00 Pred LD CMF using 0.80 AADT 0.60 0.40 0.20 0.00 0 5000 10000 15000 20000 Figure 1.
From page 119...
... For curves with an LDRATE over approximately 7 the implied CMF is less than 1.0. Pred LD CMF using EB rate 1.20 1.00 0.80 0.60 Pred LD CMF using EB rate 0.40 0.20 0.00 0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 Figure 2.
From page 120...
... Table 4. Model Results for Dark Condition Crashes Parameter Estimate Standard Error p-value a 2.8489 2.3152 0.2185 b -0.3722 0.2755 0.1767 k 0.5478 0.3739 Figure 3 plots the CMFunction from Table 4 over the range of AADT values in the calibration dataset.
From page 121...
... 4.3 Lane Departure During Dark Conditions Crashes For lane departure dark conditions crashes two models were estimated. The first model used the AADT prior to conversion as the predictor variable and the second used the EB expected number of crashes per mile-year prior to treatment.
From page 122...
... Pred LDDRK CMF using AADT 1.40 1.20 1.00 0.80 Pred LDDRK CMF using 0.60 AADT 0.40 0.20 0.00 0 5000 10000 15000 20000 Figure 4. CMFunction for Lane Departure Crashes in Dark Conditions (Model 1)
From page 123...
... Model Results for Lane Departure Crashes in Dark Conditions (Model 2) Parameter Estimate Standard Error p-value a -0.1136 0.2338 0.6272 b -0.0326 0.0264 0.2169 k 0.3442 0.3283 Figure 5 plots the CMFunction from Table 6 over the range of LDDRK values in the calibration dataset.
From page 124...
... This may in part explain why the AMFs … show decreases in safety benefits with decreased traffic volumes, which are in turn associated with roads with narrower pavement widths." The data available did not include lane or shoulder widths so the impact of those variables on the predicted CMFs could not be explored. Curve radius was available but no effects on the predicted CMFs could be determined for this dataset.
From page 125...
... Comparison of CMFs for Original and New Analysis CMF from Intercept Only Crash Type Original Study Model CMF Lane Departure 0.82 0.94 Dark Conditions 0.65 0.76 Lane Departure Dark 0.66 0.76 Conditions 6.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.