Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

Appendix O HSM Implementation of a Proposed Roadside Design CMF for Rural Two-Lane Two-Way Roads
Pages 414-456

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 414...
... Appendix O HSM Implementation of a Proposed Roadside Design CMF for Rural Two-Lane Two-Way Roads O-1
From page 415...
... O-41 SVROR Crash Severity Distribution Worksheet .................................................................................... O-42 Crash Type and Severity Distribution Worksheet ..................................................................................
From page 416...
... Appendix N described the roadside design elements that influence safety, as well as the process used to develop and verify the procedure for estimating the roadside design CMF value. Appendix N also described the development of a procedure for estimating the SVROR and non-SVROR crash severity distribution.
From page 417...
... – Mountainous: Any combination of grades and horizontal and vertical alignment that causes heavy vehicles to operate at crawl speed for significant distances or at frequent intervals. For each segment in the project limits, the roadside design elements are determined separately for each of the two sides of the road.
From page 418...
... Apply the Crash Type Distribution, if Desired The crash type distribution can be used to compute the average crash frequency for each of several crash types (e.g., collision with pedestrian, rollover, head-on collision)
From page 419...
... Section 10.X provides a procedure for updating the crash type distribution and then using it to compute the average crash frequency for specific crash types. Apply the Severity Distribution, if Desired The crash severity distribution can be used to compute the average crash frequency for each of the following severity levels: fatal, incapacitating injury, non-incapacitating injury, and possible injury.
From page 420...
... The crash type distribution values are subsequently used to estimate the "Lane Width" CMF and the "Shoulder Width and Type" CMF.] [Delete the discussion associated with the existing Roadside Design CMF.
From page 421...
... They are identified in the following list. β€’ Terrain type β€’ Longitudinal barrier type β€’ Foreslope width β€’ Side slope β€’ Narrow object count β€’ Average offset to narrow objects β€’ Miscellaneous obstacle length β€’ Miscellaneous obstacle offset O-8
From page 422...
... , ft/obstacle; and nmo = number of miscellaneous obstacles on the subject roadside. The average effective offset distance to a typical roadside feature is computed using the following equation.
From page 423...
... Equation 5 βˆ‘οΏ½πΏπΏπ‘™π‘™π‘™π‘™,𝑖𝑖 Γ— π·π·π‘œπ‘œπ‘œπ‘œπ‘œπ‘œ,𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙,𝑖𝑖 οΏ½ π·π·π‘œπ‘œπ‘œπ‘œπ‘œπ‘œ,𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙 = βˆ‘οΏ½πΏπΏπ‘™π‘™π‘™π‘™,𝑖𝑖 οΏ½ where Doff,lb = average effective offset distance to typical barrier on the subject roadside (measured from edge of traveled way) , ft; Llb,i = length longitudinal barrier piece i adjacent to the subject roadside, ft; and Doff,lb,j = offset distance to barrier piece i on the subject roadside (measured from edge of traveled way)
From page 424...
... For the calculation of the CMF for roadside design, narrow objects and miscellaneous obstacles are combined in Step 1 and represented as a set of "typical roadside features" having a common offset Doff,ob and total length Lob. This step describes the calculation of the proportion of the segment length that is adjacent to longitudinal barrier, to clear slope, and to roadside features.
From page 425...
... on the subject roadside; Lenv = average length of hazard envelope for a feature on the subject roadside (Equation 6) , ft/feature; Lob = average effective length of typical roadside feature on the subject roadside (Equation 3)
From page 426...
... or with a barrier, given that the vehicle has encroached onto the roadside adjacent to a barrier. The Part 2 Roadside Design CMF worksheet (provided in the section Worksheets)
From page 427...
... Equation 17 π‘Šπ‘Šπ‘“π‘“,𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙 = π·π·π‘œπ‘œπ‘œπ‘œπ‘œπ‘œ,𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙 βˆ’ π‘Šπ‘Šπ‘ π‘  where Wf,lb = width of that portion of the foreslope between the edge of shoulder and face of barrier on the subject roadside, ft; Ws = width of shoulder on the subject roadside, ft; and all other variables are defined previously. The third equation is used to compute the probability of a rollover crash before reaching the barrier.
From page 428...
... Equation 21 𝑝𝑝𝑑𝑑>𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷,π‘œπ‘œπ‘œπ‘œ = 0.01 Γ— expοΏ½4.605 βˆ’ 0.0790 Γ— π·π·π‘œπ‘œπ‘œπ‘œπ‘œπ‘œ,π‘œπ‘œπ‘œπ‘œ οΏ½ where pd>Doff,ob = probability that a vehicle's encroachment distance d on the subject roadside exceeds a given offset distance Doff,ob; and Doff,ob = average effective offset distance to a typical feature on the subject roadside (measured from edge of traveled way) (Equation 4)
From page 429...
... Step 7 – Compute Roadside Design CMF This step describes the calculation of the CMF for roadside design. The Part 2 Roadside Design CMF worksheet (provided in the section Worksheets)
From page 430...
... ; and Pob = proportion of the segment length that is adjacent to features (i.e., narrow objects or miscellaneous obstacles) on the subject roadside (Equation 11)
From page 431...
... Equation 29 πΆπΆπΆπΆπΆπΆπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿ = 𝑃𝑃𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠,π‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Ž Γ— 𝐢𝐢𝐢𝐢𝐢𝐢𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠 + οΏ½1 βˆ’ 𝑃𝑃𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠,π‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Ž οΏ½ where CMFrd = crash modification factor for roadside design; Psvror,as = proportion of SVROR crashes of all severities for the subject roadway segment when the roadside design elements present are at base condition values; and CMFsvror = crash modification factor for SVROR crashes. Step 8 – Adjust the Crash Type Distribution if Necessary The guidance provided in Section 10.X is applied in this step to determine if the default crash type distribution should be adjusted to more reliably reflect that for the subject segment.
From page 432...
... or the subject segment's roadside design elements are different from the base condition values in Section 10.6.1 (by a practically significant amount) , then the crash type distribution values in the last column of Table 1 should be adjusted (such that they are a more reliable reflection of the crash distribution for the subject segment)
From page 433...
... – P13,c The following equation can be used to compute the crash frequency associated with a specific crash type. Equation 30 𝑁𝑁𝑝𝑝,π‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿ,𝑦𝑦,π‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Ž = 𝑁𝑁𝑝𝑝,π‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿ,π‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Ž,π‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Ž Γ— 𝑃𝑃𝑦𝑦,π‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Ž where Np,rs,y,as = predicted average crash frequency of a road segment for crash type y and all severity levels; crashes/yr; Np,rs,at,as = predicted average crash frequency of a road segment for all crash types and severity levels; crashes/yr; and Py,as = proportion of crashes having crash type y for all severity levels combined.
From page 434...
... or the subject segment's roadside design elements are different from the base condition values in Section 10.6.1 (by a practically significant amount) , then the crash severity distribution values in the last row of Table 2 should be adjusted (such that they are a more reliable reflection of the crash distribution for the subject segment)
From page 435...
... 7.2 HSM Section 10.Y.2 – Crash Frequency by Crash Type and Severity Base Procedure Table 1 provides the default crash type and severity distribution proportions for the typical rural twolane two-way highway segment. If the proportion of SVROR crashes obtained from Equation 28 is different from the typical value of 0.5399 (by a practically significant amount)
From page 436...
... β€’ SVROR Crash Severity Distribution worksheet β€’ Crash Type and Severity Distribution worksheet The Roadside Design Element, Roadside Design CMF (Part 1) , the Roadside Design CMF (Part 2)
From page 437...
... . Step 3 – Compute SVROR Crash Severity Distribution This step describes the calculation of the "proportion of SVROR crashes" by severity level for the segment of interest.
From page 438...
... ; Psvror,as = proportion of SVROR crashes of all severities for the subject roadway segment when the roadside design elements present are at base condition values (Equation 28) ; pc,P = probability of a SVROR crash, given an encroachment on the primary roadside and based on input variables describing the primary roadside (Equation 26)
From page 439...
... 8.2 The Questions What is the predicted average crash frequency of the roadway segment for a particular year? What is the crash severity distribution for the SVROR and non-SVROR crash types?
From page 440...
...  3.5H:1V side slope  80 narrow objects  11.5 average offset to narrow objects (measured from edge of traveled way)  No miscellaneous obstacles 8.4 Assumptions β€’ The roadside design elements do not match the base condition values in Section 10.6.1 so the crash type distribution will need to be estimated using the guidance in Section 10.X and the severity distribution for SVROR crashes will need to be estimated using the guidance in Section 10.Y.2.
From page 441...
... Step 1 – Compute Offset to Typical Roadside Elements The average effective length of the typical roadside features (i.e., objects and obstacles) on the primary direction roadside is computed as follows (the value for the opposing direction is the same for this segment)
From page 442...
... The average length of the hazard envelope can be computed using the following equation. 𝐿𝐿𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒 = πΏπΏπ‘œπ‘œπ‘œπ‘œ + πΏπΏπ‘œπ‘œπ‘œπ‘œ = 47.85 + 0.667 = 48.52 ft/feature Step 3 – Compute the Distribution of Segment Length by Roadside Element The proportion of the segment that is adjacent to longitudinal barrier is computed as: βˆ‘πΏπΏπ‘™π‘™π‘™π‘™,𝑖𝑖 975 𝑃𝑃𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙 = = = 0.123 5280 Γ— 𝐿𝐿 5280 Γ— 1.5 The density of the collective set of features is computed as: 𝑛𝑛𝑛𝑛𝑛𝑛 + π‘›π‘›π‘šπ‘šπ‘šπ‘š 80 + 0 π‘‘π‘‘π‘œπ‘œπ‘œπ‘œ = = = 60.8 features/mile 𝐿𝐿 βˆ’ οΏ½βˆ‘πΏπΏπ‘™π‘™π‘™π‘™,𝑖𝑖 /5280οΏ½ 1.5 βˆ’ (975/5280)
From page 443...
... = 0.623 The average effective offset distance to a typical barrier Doff,lb was computed in Step 1 as 6.0 ft. The width of that portion of the foreslope between the edge of shoulder and the face of the barrier is computed as: π‘Šπ‘Šπ‘“π‘“,𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙 = π·π·π‘œπ‘œπ‘œπ‘œπ‘œπ‘œ,𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙 βˆ’ π‘Šπ‘Šπ‘ π‘  = 6.0 βˆ’ 4.0 = 2.0 ft The probability of a crash by rollover before reaching the barrier (given an encroachment)
From page 444...
... or with the typical feature (given an encroachment) is computed as: 𝑝𝑝𝑐𝑐,π‘œπ‘œπ‘œπ‘œ+π‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿ = 𝑝𝑝𝑐𝑐,π‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿ,π‘œπ‘œπ‘œπ‘œ + 𝑝𝑝𝑐𝑐,π‘œπ‘œπ‘œπ‘œ = 0.146 + 0.344 = 0.490 Step 7 – Compute Roadside Design CMF The probability of a SVROR crash in the primary direction (given an encroachment)
From page 445...
... = 1.061 Step 8 – Adjust the Crash Type Distribution if Necessary The guidance in Section 10.X is to use the default crash type distribution in Table 1 unless one or both of the following conditions is satisfied: 1. The proportion of SVROR crashes Psvror,as from Step 7 is different from 0.5399 (by a practically significant amount)
From page 446...
... Completed Crash Type Distribution worksheet for Sample Problem 1. Segment number (c = 1)
From page 447...
... , severity distribution, and crash type distribution. Apply the Severity Distribution, if Desired It is desired to obtain the severity distribution for the SVROR and non-SVROR crash types.
From page 448...
... This guidance directs the analyst to complete the SVROR Crash Severity Distribution worksheet and the Crash Type and Severity Distribution worksheet, in this order. The proportion of SVROR crashes Psvror,as was previously computed as 0.359.
From page 449...
... for the segment is computed as: π‘ƒπ‘ƒπ‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Ž,𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠,π‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Ž = π‘ƒπ‘ƒπ‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Ž,𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠,𝐾𝐾 + π‘ƒπ‘ƒπ‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Ž,𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠,𝐴𝐴 + π‘ƒπ‘ƒπ‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Ž,𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠,𝐡𝐡 + π‘ƒπ‘ƒπ‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Ž,𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠,𝐢𝐢 + π‘ƒπ‘ƒπ‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Ž,𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠,𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃 = 0.0071 + 0.0295 + 0.0613 + 0.0833 + 0.2141 = 0.3953 Step 4 – Compute Non-SVROR Crash Severity Distribution The crash type and severity distribution in Table 1 is adjusted using the guidance offered in the Crash Type and Severity Distribution worksheet. The completed worksheet is shown in Table 4.
From page 450...
... d – P13,c = P4,c + P5,c e – P14,c = (P1,c +...+ P11,c) – P13,c Equation 32 is used with the values in the last two rows of Table 4 to estimate the crash frequency by severity level for the SVROR and non-SVROR crash types.
From page 451...
... mo,P: Lmo,O: (Lβˆ™D) mo,O: Obstacle count nmo,P: nmo,O: Roadside Design Element Calculations Primary Opposing Variable Direction Direction Base Condition Average effective length of typical roadside feature Lob (ft/feature)
From page 452...
... Proportion of SVROR crashes when roadside design elements are at base condition values Psvror,as 𝑃𝑃𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠,π‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Ž = 2.150 Γ— 𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴 βˆ’0.1797 Γ— 1.0068π‘Šπ‘Šπ‘™π‘™ Γ— 0.9820π‘Šπ‘Šπ‘Šπ‘Š,𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝 Γ— 0.9616π‘Šπ‘Šπ‘Šπ‘Š,𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒 Γ— 0.9539𝐹𝐹 Γ— 0.9935𝑀𝑀 a – Variable is obtained from the Roadside Design Element worksheet.
From page 453...
... or with the typical feature pc,ob+roll 0.400 𝑝𝑝𝑐𝑐,π‘œπ‘œπ‘œπ‘œ+π‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿ = 𝑝𝑝𝑐𝑐,π‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿ,π‘œπ‘œπ‘œπ‘œ + 𝑝𝑝𝑐𝑐,π‘œπ‘œπ‘œπ‘œ Roadside Design CMF Primary Opposing Base Input Variables Direction Direction Condition Proportion of segment length with clear slope Pclear b Proportion of segment length adjacent to longitudinal barrier Plb b Proportion of segment length adjacent to features Pob b Probability of a rollover crash pc,roll b Proportion of SVROR crashes of all severities on segment Psvror,as b -- Calculations Probability of a SVROR crash pc pc,P: pc,O: pc,base: 0.290 𝑝𝑝𝑐𝑐 = �𝑃𝑃𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐 Γ— 𝑝𝑝𝑐𝑐,π‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿ οΏ½ + �𝑃𝑃𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙 Γ— 𝑝𝑝𝑐𝑐,𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙+π‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿ οΏ½ + οΏ½π‘ƒπ‘ƒπ‘œπ‘œπ‘œπ‘œ Γ— 𝑝𝑝𝑐𝑐,π‘œπ‘œπ‘œπ‘œ+π‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿ οΏ½ Crash modification factor for SVROR crashes CMFsvror -- 𝐢𝐢𝐢𝐢𝐢𝐢𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠 = 0.5 Γ— �𝑝𝑝𝑐𝑐,𝑃𝑃 ⁄𝑝𝑝𝑐𝑐,𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏 οΏ½ + 0.5 Γ— �𝑝𝑝𝑐𝑐,𝑂𝑂 ⁄𝑝𝑝𝑐𝑐,𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏 οΏ½ Crash modification factor for roadside design CMFrd -- πΆπΆπΆπΆπΆπΆπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿ = 𝑃𝑃𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠,π‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Ž Γ— 𝐢𝐢𝐢𝐢𝐢𝐢𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠 + οΏ½1 βˆ’ 𝑃𝑃𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠,π‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Ž οΏ½ a – Variable is obtained from the Roadside Design Element worksheet. b – Variable is obtained from the Roadside Design CMF worksheet (Part 1)
From page 454...
... a (Pr,2) Guidance for Estimating Adjusted Proportions Pr,2 SINGLE-VEHICLE Collision with animal (r =1)
From page 455...
... of crash with a feature without rolling prior to impact pc,ob c Calculations Proportion of crashes before a feature (by rollover) or with a feature having severity z Pob+roll,z π‘ƒπ‘ƒπ‘œπ‘œπ‘œπ‘œ+π‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿ,𝑧𝑧 = �𝑝𝑝𝑐𝑐,π‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿ,π‘œπ‘œπ‘œπ‘œ Γ— π‘ƒπ‘ƒπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿ,𝑧𝑧 + 𝑝𝑝𝑐𝑐,π‘œπ‘œπ‘œπ‘œ Γ— π‘ƒπ‘ƒπ‘œπ‘œπ‘œπ‘œ,𝑧𝑧 οΏ½/�𝑝𝑝𝑐𝑐,π‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿ,π‘œπ‘œπ‘œπ‘œ + 𝑝𝑝𝑐𝑐,π‘œπ‘œπ‘œπ‘œ οΏ½ Severity Distribution Primary Direction Opposing Direction Input Variables K A B C PDO K A B C PDO Proportion of segment length with clear slope Pclear b Proportion of segment length adjacent to barrier Plb b Proportion of segment length adjacent to features Pob b Probability of a SVROR crash pc c Proportion of SVROR crashes of all severities on segment Psvror,as b Crash modification factor for roadside design CMFrd c Calculations Proportion of crashes having severity z Pz 𝑃𝑃𝑧𝑧 = �𝑃𝑃𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐 Γ— π‘ƒπ‘ƒπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿ,𝑧𝑧 οΏ½ + �𝑃𝑃𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙 Γ— 𝑃𝑃𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙+π‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿ,𝑧𝑧 οΏ½ + οΏ½π‘ƒπ‘ƒπ‘œπ‘œπ‘œπ‘œ Γ— π‘ƒπ‘ƒπ‘œπ‘œπ‘œπ‘œ+π‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿ,𝑧𝑧 οΏ½ Segment (Both Directions)
From page 456...
... Table 1 /Pr,1; where "(Pr,c) Table 1" is the value of Pr,c in Table 1 and Padj,svror,z is obtained from the SVROR Crash Severity Distribution worksheet.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.