The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.
From page 6... ...
6 Overview This report documents the work conducted by NCHRP Project 07-26, "Update of Highway Capacity Manual: Merge, Diverge, and Weaving Methodologies." The report is organized as follows: • Chapter 1, "Background," describes the project background and objectives, synthesizes the results of a review of relevant literature, identifies key knowledge gaps, and summarizes the current (Version 6.0) Highway Capacity Manual (HCM)
|
From page 7... ...
Background 7 enhancements to the HCM. NCHRP Web-Only Document 343 and products associated with this report can be found on the National Academies Press website (nap.nationalacademies.org)
|
From page 8... ...
8 Update of Highway Capacity Manual : Merge, Diverge, and Weaving Methodologies Task 2. Synthesize the literature review to identify the knowledge gaps and summarize information on the effectiveness of existing analytical methodologies for freeway merges and diverges, emphasizing any available information on their compatibility with basic freeway and weaving segment methodologies.
|
From page 9... ...
Background 9 sizes and differences in traffic laws, traffic cultures, and road standards between countries. It then presents summaries of relevant literature on freeway merges, freeway diverges, and freeway weaving, respectively, and includes topics within each summary organized in generally decreasing order of previous research activity.
|
From page 10... ...
10 Update of Highway Capacity Manual : Merge, Diverge, and Weaving Methodologies – Zhao et al.
|
From page 11... ...
Background 11 an even slower-moving truck)
|
From page 12... ...
12 Update of Highway Capacity Manual : Merge, Diverge, and Weaving Methodologies length of the acceleration lane. The smallest accepted gaps in the dataset were between 0.75 and 1.0 seconds, resulting in net headways between two cars of 0.25 seconds.
|
From page 13... ...
Background 13 that on average, drivers used 41.5% of the acceleration lane length and that very few maneuvers occurred prior to the end of the solid white stripe. The average merging speed and the variation of speed were higher with a tapered merge compared with an acceleration lane.
|
From page 14... ...
14 Update of Highway Capacity Manual : Merge, Diverge, and Weaving Methodologies breakdown occurred because of mainline traffic changing lanes to the left in advance of the on-ramp; in this case, prebreakdown flow and queue discharge flow increased with an increasing proportion of ramp traffic due to poor mainline utilization of the right-hand lane. Mainline operations did not clearly deteriorate with increasing ramp volume, indicating the benefit of the ramp meters to manage the merging traffic.
|
From page 15... ...
Background 15 Capacity Elefteriadou, Kondyli, and St. George (2014)
|
From page 16... ...
16 Update of Highway Capacity Manual : Merge, Diverge, and Weaving Methodologies the right and the left) and found that the merge section capacity decreased as the merging volume increased.
|
From page 17... ...
Background 17 but ramp metering was twice as effective overall (in terms of percentage increase in throughput)
|
From page 18... ...
18 Update of Highway Capacity Manual : Merge, Diverge, and Weaving Methodologies Asgharzadeh and Kondyli (2018) compared four freeway merge capacity models -- van Aerde, Product Limit Method, Sustainable Flow Index, and HCM 6th Edition -- to data collected at six freeway merges in the Kansas City region.
|
From page 19... ...
Background 19 the characteristics of a diverge bottleneck were like those of a merge bottleneck: the capacity drop increases as the diverging flow increases (most of the effect occurs with the first 100−200 vph) , the diverging length decreases, and the diverging speed decreases.
|
From page 20... ...
20 Update of Highway Capacity Manual : Merge, Diverge, and Weaving Methodologies (nine of which had cross sections of five or more lanes) , 13 balanced major weaves, and five unbalanced major weaves.
|
From page 21... ...
Background 21 freeway-to-ramp weaves occurred within the first 630 ft of the physical weaving area, and 90% of ramp-to-freeway weaves occurred within the first 1,060 ft of physical weaving area (that is, just past the end of the short length)
|
From page 22... ...
22 Update of Highway Capacity Manual : Merge, Diverge, and Weaving Methodologies effect)
|
From page 23... ...
Background 23 (2) continuing it to the next ramp.
|
From page 24... ...
24 Update of Highway Capacity Manual : Merge, Diverge, and Weaving Methodologies length has limited effect on the weaving section's capacity and operation. Speed and density homogenization caused the weaving section breakdown.
|
From page 25... ...
Background 25 normal, moderately aggressive, aggressive) were applied to those segments.
|
From page 26... ...
26 Update of Highway Capacity Manual : Merge, Diverge, and Weaving Methodologies equally. The model was tested on a single three-lane weaving section in Grenoble, France, with reasonable results.
|
From page 27... ...
Background 27 Sasahara, Elefteriadou, and Dong (2019) proposed a lane-by-lane analysis method for basic segments.
|
From page 28... ...
28 Update of Highway Capacity Manual : Merge, Diverge, and Weaving Methodologies Merge Segments Prebreakdown Capacity and Breakdown Probability Effect of Ramp Volume There is good international agreement in the literature that prebreakdown merge capacity decreases as ramp demand increases (Aksoy and Öğüt 2018; Bates et al. 2013; Dehman and Drakopoulos 2013, 2016; Elefteriadou et al.
|
From page 29... ...
Background 29 flow per lane and the acceleration lane length per 10 mph of speed limit. Reina and Ahn (2014)
|
From page 30... ...
30 Update of Highway Capacity Manual : Merge, Diverge, and Weaving Methodologies Queue Discharge Flow Factors Affecting the Capacity Drop The developers of numerical models have suggested the following relations between various factors and the size of the capacity drop at a merge bottleneck: • Merging speed (Chen and Ahn 2018; Leclercq et al.
|
From page 31... ...
Background 31 prebreakdown capacity and queue discharge flow values as for merge segments (see Table 4 and Table 5 earlier)
|
From page 32... ...
32 Update of Highway Capacity Manual : Merge, Diverge, and Weaving Methodologies • The method sometimes estimates that weaving speeds are greater than nonweaving speeds (Zhou et al.
|
From page 33... ...
Background 33 sites found that prebreakdown capacity decreases as the weaving ratio increases. Rudjanakanoknad and Akaravorakulchai (2011)
|
From page 34... ...
34 Update of Highway Capacity Manual : Merge, Diverge, and Weaving Methodologies FFS of the weaving and nonweaving lanes may be substantially different. Sasahara, Elefteriadou, and Dong (2019)
|
From page 35... ...
Capacity On-ramp flow rate, merge ratio, and ramp speed affect merge capacity. Merge capacity is adversely affected by higher ramp flows.
|
From page 36... ...
36 Update of Highway Capacity Manual : Merge, Diverge, and Weaving Methodologies Other Inputs Lane-by-lane volume and analysis can now be performed. Lane distribution is sensitive to volume-to-capacity ratio, percent heavy vehicles, upstream and downstream ramp ratios, weekend conditions, and nighttime conditions.
|
From page 37... ...
Background 37 Performance Measure Basic Segment (HCM Chapter 12) Weaving Segment (HCM Chapter 13)
|
From page 38... ...
38 Update of Highway Capacity Manual : Merge, Diverge, and Weaving Methodologies Travel time reliability analysis requires the same data needed to estimate speeds, plus information on the variability of demand; the severity, frequency, and duration of incidents; the frequency of severe weather conditions; and the frequency of work zones by the number of lanes closed by duration. Geometric Congurations Covered e HCM divides the freeway facility into uniform segments that are analyzed to determine capacity, performance, and LOS.
|
From page 39... ...
Background 39 for the current HCM merge, diverge, and weaving methods are illustrated in Figure 6 through Figure 8 and include the following: 1. Close Merges – Close merges occur where two or more ramps fall within 1,500 of each other.
|
From page 40... ...
40 Update of Highway Capacity Manual : Merge, Diverge, and Weaving Methodologies Figure 6. Geometries not well covered by current HCM Chapters 13 and 14 (#1 through #5 in list in text)
|
From page 41... ...
Background 41 5. Multiple Weaving Segment – Section 4 ("Extensions to the Methodology")
|
From page 42... ...
42 Update of Highway Capacity Manual : Merge, Diverge, and Weaving Methodologies 11. Diverge Off Five-Lane Freeway – Section 4 of HCM Chapter 14 provides a table to estimate the volume in the fifth lane.
|
From page 43... ...
Background 43 • The method underestimates capacities at high weaving ratios (Skabardonis and Mauch 2014)
|
From page 44... ...
44 Update of Highway Capacity Manual : Merge, Diverge, and Weaving Methodologies Each of these freeway management strategies may employ one or more managed lane tactics. There is a wide variety of these tactics that can be classified by their salient characteristics: • Pricing.
|
From page 45... ...
Background 45 After removing the real-time options, the following freeway management and managed lane tactics remain. It would be desirable for the HCM freeway methodologies to better address: • Ramp Management – Static time of day, local dynamic, system dynamic.
|
From page 46... ...
46 Update of Highway Capacity Manual : Merge, Diverge, and Weaving Methodologies • The HCM's merge/diverge methods violate the fundamental relationship between flow, density, and speed. • The HCM's capacity guidance for merge and diverge sections is poor.
|
Key Terms
This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More
information on Chapter Skim is available.