Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:


Pages 58-60

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 58...
... 58 This chapter summarizes the major findings from the experimental program and the parametric FEA studies performed in Stage 2 of NCHRP Project 12-113. Section 5.1 outlines the key conclusions and Section 5.2 provides recommendations for cross-frame analysis.
From page 59...
... Conclusions and Recommendations 59 cross-frames are relatively stiff systems, and the use of a smaller R-factor for WT sections should not significantly affect the overall efficiency or economy of the system when WT sections are used for the cross-frames when stability forces or deformations are considered. • Results from the parametric studies showed that the most appropriate R-factor for WT crossframes for in-service bridges in their composite condition is 0.8.
From page 60...
... 60 Improved Cross-Frame Analysis and Design: Wide-Flange T-Shape Sections In addition, the current AASHTO provisions refer to "flange-connected WT sections." The research team considered both flange-connected and stem-connected WT sections. The stemconnected WT sections included coped flanges and offset sections that did not require coping.

Key Terms



This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.