On Being a Scientist Responsible Conduct in Research, Second Edition (1995) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:
Appendix: Discussion of Case Studies
Appendix: Discussion of Case Studies
Pages 25-29
The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.
From page 25... ...
W~11 he enjoy science as much if he purposefully limits communication with others? INDUSTRIAL SPONSORSHIP OF ACADEMIC RESEARCH Sandra has enrolled in the university to receive an education, not to work for industry.
|
From page 26... ...
FABRICATION IN A GRANT APPLICATION Even though Don did not introduce spurious results into science, he fabricated the submission of the research paper and therefore engaged in misconduct. Though his treatment by the department might seem harsh, fabrication strikes so directly at the foundations of science that it is not excusable.
|
From page 27... ...
Researchers might then have to decide the extent to which they are willing to impose and enforce sanctions themselves. A CASE OF PLAGIARISM A broad spectrum of misconduct falls into the category of plagiarism, ranging from obvious theft to uncredited paraphrasing that some might not consider dishonest at all.
|
From page 29... ...
was established in 1970 by the National Academy of Sciences to secure the services of eminent members of appropriate professions in the examination of policy matters pertaining to the health of the public. The Institute acts under the responsibility given to the National Academy of Sciences in its congressional charter to be an advisor to the federal government and, upon its own initiative, to identify issues of medical care, research, and education.
|
Key Terms
This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More
information on Chapter Skim is available.