Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

APPENDIX E - DISSENTING STATEMENT ON ISSUE 1
Pages 225-226

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 225...
... Since the data sets indicate much more rapid and more copious vadose zone water transport than acknowledged in the license application, they raise considerable concern about the suitability of the site for a LLRW repository. Without a resolution of this uncertainty by showing the absence of tritium at depth and the absence of a downward vertical gradient (or a defensible explanation for both phenomena)
From page 226...
... Since the raised cap will have no surface water runon from upsiope areas, much of the time the soil moisture will be reduced and hence the cap mI} not be able to support as dense a vegetative cover During infrequent periods of heavy rainfall, more water may infiltrate than can be evapotranspired by the sparse vegetation before the water has time to percolate deep into the cap and then into the waste. Studies referenced in the report have found that unvegetated arid regions can have significant water fluxes and water fluxes could also be greater through a sparsely vegetated cap during periods of heavy rainfall.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.