Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:


Pages 148-178

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 148...
... relate to the Endangered Species Act. One of the largest of these concerns the valuation of rarity.
From page 149...
... Congress annually appropriates funds for the Office of Endangered Species in the United States that are not adequate to list more than a small fraction of the candidate species or to pay for more than a fraction of the possible recovery plans for all enciangered species.
From page 150...
... Boyle and Bishop (1987) estimated the value of preserving the striped shiner, a Wisconsin endangered species.
From page 151...
... In part because of uncertainties in biological knowledge, the long-term costs and benefits of protecting endangered species and their ecosystems is poorly known. In our world of limited resources, the harsh fact is that we must give to get.
From page 152...
... 1993. Implementation of an ecosystem approach to endangered species conservation.
From page 153...
... Ecological Applications 3:218-220. Wilson, E
From page 155...
... IS THE ESA WORKING? Is the Endangered Species Act working?
From page 156...
... concludes that the National Wildlife Refuge system is contributing to the recovery of endangered species. Combined with the mandates for federal agencies to avoid jeopardy and the ban on taking listed species, the affirmative steps provided in the ESA are helping to ease the risk to other species too.
From page 157...
... The agency further states that it emphasizes cooperation and teamwork among all involved parties. As clescribe(i in Chapter 4, the resource agencies had approved 411 recovery plans covering 5 13 species as of March 1993 54% ofthe 956 U.S.
From page 158...
... PROTECTION OF ECOSYSTEMS Although it is clear that the ESA has resulted in the protection of some ecosystems on which endangered species depend, our ability to quantify the contribution the FWS and NMFS regulatory programs make in protecting them is limitecI. Lacking effective metrics, we are left to compare the relative advantages and disadvantages of species-by-species ~nanagement so common in the listing an(l recovery programs with more regional ecosystem-oriented efforts.
From page 159...
... , the Environmental Protection Agency, and the Bureau of Reclamation. THE FUTURE: BEYOND THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT The ESA anti other existing programs will not by themselves prevent all future extinctions of species in the Unitecl States.
From page 160...
... She said (as quoted by the Jackson Hole News, February 8, 1995~: "The Endangered Species Act is .
From page 161...
... It therefore concludes that any coherent, successful program to prevent species endangerments and to protect the nation's biological diversity is going to require more enlightened commitments on the part of all major parties to achieve success. To conserve natural habitats, approaches must be developed that rely on cooperation and innovative procedures; examples provided for by the ESA are habitat conservation plans anti natural community consecration planning.
From page 162...
... 1986. Saving Endangered Species, Amending the Implementing the Endangered Species Act.
From page 163...
... Appendix A
From page 165...
... . P`~mo`;t two decades havo pb88e~ since the Endangered Species Act was first enacted by congress.
From page 166...
... RISK. Judgments about acceptable r isk pervade many of ache cieci'3ions required by fiche Endangered species Act, including those relating to whether and how to list a species and what cons~ci.CUtes Jeopardy, adverse modification, reosonable and prudery alternatives, taking, conservation and recovery.
From page 167...
... . 4 November 27, 1991 Page Three We appreciate your attention to Chit; request and believe that a report by the tintional Academy could make an impor~cant con~cribution to the public discourse on ache Endangered Specie'; ACt.
From page 169...
... Appendix B
From page 171...
... o v ¢ to In ~ ~ ~ ~ c" U-F~ ~ !
From page 173...
... S S 8 =~ IS ~ e a C C o 6 8 '= O ~ ~ ~ 6 :: r 2= 0| I, i ~L, a: :: ¢ i L $3L3 s L L5~3I L LTZ1,=E · em C ~ C 3 =.= C-~='.~ oats: C 6.~°,3m a4Q 60~ at _ I,' bD ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~-~ ,~ X C ~ ~ C C 6' S ,y ,6 C ~ = = e = 6 =~ ~ .~ ~ ~ C of ~ ~ ~ ~= o = 3 E 9 5' '3 = , - L ~ '1' ==1 1 3' "i 3 c Cc o~ °= ·~ C C C ~ C 8 ~ S ~ ~ = c C, g~ i3 = = = = = = = = ~ E = ~c 5~ 6 ~ 6~ = ~ O ~= .C ~ O ~ ~ C C ' ES C o :~ ~ _.
From page 175...
... EM ° ~ C :E = 8 .3 E =3 ,= C <~, a1~_,8a es ~ it, _ ~ 9 ;~5 o '.
From page 177...
... ~ ~ A: ~ ~ c ~ ~ ~= C C E ° C~ o~ ~ 8~ ~ ~ ~ C C C C ~two ~ a~= ~ ~ o =~m ~ c ~ -A s.~`~.ti2 !
From page 178...
... ;' ~· i · of ,~ At ~ ~-~ ·- gm o of 5 c; e O r ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ c o E 9 c, ~ -0 E e -0 e ~ 0, ., _ ~ C)


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.