Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

III Tax Reform: Prescriptions and Prospects
8 INTERNATIONAL TAX AND COMPETITIVENESS ASPECTS OF INTERNATIONAL TAX REFORM
Pages 85-108

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 85...
... tax treaty network depending on how foreign governments react. Thus, the international implications of fundamental tax reform cannot be ignored.
From page 86...
... · Harmonization. The United States should not depart unnecessarily from widely accepted international income tax norms.
From page 87...
... tax treaty network depending on how foreign governments react. Thus, the international implications of fundamental tax reform cannot be ignored.
From page 88...
... · Harmonization. The United States should not depart unnecessarily from widely accepted international income tax norms.
From page 89...
... The foreign tax credit systems of other countries generally are simpler. · Virtually alone among the major industrial countries, the United States refuses to accept tax sparing provisions in its bilateral income tax treaties.
From page 90...
... Unlike other countries, the United States imposes an alternative minimum tax that limits utilization of otherwise allowable foreign tax credits. This can result in U.S.
From page 91...
... Since the changes in the international tax rules made by the 1986 Tax Reform Act, a number of bills have been introduced in Congress to make incremental reforms in the present international income tax rules.2 In the 104th session of Congress, more fundamental tax reform proposals were introduced that would have replaced the income tax system with a consumption-based tax system. These fundamental tax reform proposals are discussed in the following section and in the last section of this chapter.
From page 92...
... The United States now has bilateral income tax treaties with nearly 50 countries. The treaties provide numerous benefits to investors, including reduced withholding tax rates on income flows between the United States and the treaty partner.
From page 93...
... Rather, multinationals would have an incentive to shift profits out of other countries that impose income taxes and into the United States (by inflating interest and royalty payments to the United States) ; (Avi-Yonah, 1995, p.
From page 94...
... tax system could have a significant impact on decisions relating to the development and use of technology. All three leading tax reform proposals the USA Tax, the Flat Tax, and the National Retail 5The Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 extended the tax benefit of foreign sales corporations to software exports.
From page 95...
... Royalties received for the use of intangible assets outside the United States generally are considered territorially to be foreign-source income for purposes of the foreign tax credit. Under the so-called look-through rules, foreign royalties 6According to the report of the National Commission on Economic Growth and Tax Reform, "attention must be given to the proper tax treatment of foreign-source license fees, royalties, and other intangibles so as not to discourage research and development in the United States." 7Deductions allowed under section 174 are reduced by an amount equal to 100 percent of the taxpayer research credit.
From page 96...
... It is possible that the drafters were concerned that inclusion of a research credit could jeopardize the legality of border tax adjustments under the GATT. Unlike the USA Tax, however, the Armey Flat Tax does not have border adjustments; consequently, GATT considerations would not preclude inclusion of a research tax credit in a Flat Tax system.
From page 97...
... Foreign withholding taxes levied on royalties and other income would not be deductible or creditable under the Flat Tax. Impact on withholding taxes: As discussed above, it is possible that existing treaties and withholding rates might be jeopardized if the United States unilaterally were to eliminate its income tax system.
From page 98...
... and, in the case of the excess foreign tax credit taxpayer, the utilization of foreign tax credits (in excess of the 5 percent withholding tax on the royalty)
From page 99...
... Thus, for the taxpayer in this example, the USA Tax would increase the after-tax cost of R&D by about 210 percent, depending on whether or not the taxpayer currently is in an excess foreign tax credit position. The potential rise in the after-tax cost of R&D primarily is attributable to the loss of the research and foreign tax credits and the inability to deduct compensation and payroll taxes.
From page 100...
... This represents about a 5-14 percent increase in the after-tax cost of R&D, compared to present law, under both the Flat Tax and the USA Business Tax (see Table 8.2~. INCREMENTAL REFORM OF THE INCOME TAX SYSTEM As an alternative to fundamental tax reform, incremental changes to the existing income tax system could be adopted.
From page 101...
... These tasks certainly would be simplified by proposals to reduce the number of foreign tax credit baskets required by current law. Thus it is time to consider replacing the basket approach entirely with some simpler foreign tax credit system or even with a territorial income tax system (described below)
From page 102...
... Under regular income tax rules, a U.S. taxpayer may claim a foreign tax credit for foreign taxes paid up to 100 percent of its U.S.
From page 103...
... Because passive investment income presumably would be taxed currently, look-through, anti-deferral, and foreign tax credit rules generally would remain necessary for passive foreign income. Transfer pricing issues would be at least as important under a territorial income tax system as they are today.
From page 104...
... In addition, each of the leading fundamental tax reform proposals could increase tax burdens on U.S. technology and U.S.
From page 105...
... Pp. 19-20 in The Effectiveness of Research and Experimentation Tax Credits.
From page 106...
... source 75% Present Law Flat Tax USA Tax ExcessDeficit Armey- Revenue Nunn ItemFTCFTCShelbyneutralDomenici Tax status Tax rate35%35%17%21%11% Effective rate of R&D credit 4.4% 4.4% NA NA NA Foreign tax credit position Excess Deficit NA NA NA AMT no no NA NA NA Gross income 90.68 98.15 104.87 105.56 99.63 U.S. source 45.34 49.08 52.44 52.78 49.82 Foreign royalty, gross of withholding tax 45.34 49.08 52.44 52.78 49.82 Withholding tax 2.27 2.45 2.62 2.64 2.49 Research expense (section 174)
From page 107...
... source 75% Present Law Flat Tax USA Taxa Excess Deficit Armey- Revenue Nunn Item FTC FTCShelbyneutralDomenici Tax status Tax rate 35% 35%17%21%11% Effective rate of R&D credit 4.4% 4.4% NA NA NA Foreign tax credit position Excess Deficit NA NA NA AMT no no NA NA NA Gross income 90.68 98.15 103.11 103.27 102.56 U.S. source 45.34 49.08 51.56 51.64 51.28 Foreign royalty, gross of withholding tax 45.34 49.08 51.56 51.64 51.28 Withholding tax 2.27 2.45 2.58 2.58 2.56 Research expense (sec.
From page 108...
... GLENN Hug BARD Columbia University and the National Bureau of Economic Research INTRODUCTION As multinational corporations play a larger role in the business activities of the global economy, interest in international aspects of capital income taxation has been stimulated. In the United States, debate has centered on the competitive position of U.S.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.