Electrometallurgical Techniques for DOE Spent Fuel Treatment Spring 1998 Status Report on Argonne National Laboratory's R & D Activity (1998) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:
4 Demonstration Project Success Criteria
4 Demonstration Project Success Criteria
Pages 23-26
The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.
From page 23... ...
S-7 and S-8. 2 Electrometallurgical Techniques for DOE Spent Fuel Treatment: Fall 1996 Status Report on Argonne National Laboratory's R&D Activity, National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1997, p.
|
From page 24... ...
Determine performance characterization with electrochemical technique, corrosion tests, vapor hydration tests, and attribute tests. Develop metal waste process specifications for major process variables: operating temperatures, hold time, and cooling rate.
|
From page 25... ...
Show that FCF personnel exposure is less than 0.5 rem per year average and l.5 rem per year for the maximum individual exposure, which is a factor of 3 less than the DOE Occupational Radiation Protection Final Rule lOCFRS35 limit that is 5 rem per year. Demonstrate a material control and accountability system that shows the historical inventory difference for uranium and plutonium is within control limits based on variance propagation of measurement and sampling errors, as specified in DOE Order 5633.3B.
|
From page 26... ...
The committee finds that the U.S. DOE has developed a reasonable set of criteria for judging th success of the EBR-~I spent fuel treatment demonstration.
|
Key Terms
This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More
information on Chapter Skim is available.