Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

9 REPRODUCTIVE AND DEVELOPMENTAL TOXICITY OF PERMETHRIN
Pages 79-86

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 79...
... Environmental Health Criteria (TPCS, 1990) and the California Environmental Protection Agency's Risk Characterization Document (CEPA, 1992~.
From page 80...
... Maternal toxicity was seen at 150 mg/kg, and reduced fetal body weight and delayed ossification were seen at 150 mg/kg. The maternal and developmental NOAELs were 50 mg/kg.
From page 81...
... In both generations, there was a dose-related increase in the occurrence of buphthalmos (enlargement of the eye) and papillary membrane (a mesodermal layer attached to the iris during embryonic development)
From page 82...
... No effects were noted in the permethrin-exposed animals. OTHER STUDIES Since the multigenerational studies did not include data on specific reproductive toxicity, such as organ weights, histopathology, or semen measurements, other data were reviewed to determine whether there
From page 83...
... Another chronic toxicity study submitted to EPA by Wellcome (Life Science Research, 1980) was a dietary feeding study in which Charles River Wistar rats were fed permethrin at 0, 10, 50 and 250 mg/kg of body weight per day (cis/trans ratio, 25:75~.
From page 84...
... No data are available from dermal exposure studies, but oral dosing would be expected to maximize any effects, since dermal absorption is poor. Where toxic effects have been reported, other similar studies have not confirmed those effects.
From page 85...
... Current procedures include Bouin's fixation of testes to obtain good histological results. One chronic toxicity study in mice (Tierney
From page 86...
... , the possibility of male reproductive effects or other reproductive and development effects occurring from wearing permethrin-~mpregnated BDUs or working with treated fabric seems remote. It should be noted, however, that no data are available from dermal exposure studies.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.